2011
DOI: 10.3989/scimar.2011.75n4719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The emergence of regularity and variability in marine ecosystems: the combined role of physics, chemistry and biology

Abstract: SUMMARY: Marine ecosystems play an integral role in the functioning of life on earth. To predict how they will respond to global changes, and to effectively manage and maintain services upon which humans rely, we must understand how biological processes at the cellular level generate macroscopic patterns in the oceans. Here, we discuss how physics and biogeochemistry influence and constrain marine ecosystem structure and function, and outline key regularities and patterns of variability that models should aim … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(145 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These short scales of variability for BGC are in agreement with the effect of nutrient cycling, reproductive rate, and community interaction (e.g. grazing pressure from zooplankton) that can lead to patches of 5-10 km (Ballantyne et al, 2011;Denman et al, 1977;Goebel et al, 2014). According to Mahadevan and Campbell (2002), the fine-scale patchy distribution of phytoplankton is linked to the short characteristic time in response to disturbance in their concentration, as opposed to the longer time for temperature to adjust to external forcing.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These short scales of variability for BGC are in agreement with the effect of nutrient cycling, reproductive rate, and community interaction (e.g. grazing pressure from zooplankton) that can lead to patches of 5-10 km (Ballantyne et al, 2011;Denman et al, 1977;Goebel et al, 2014). According to Mahadevan and Campbell (2002), the fine-scale patchy distribution of phytoplankton is linked to the short characteristic time in response to disturbance in their concentration, as opposed to the longer time for temperature to adjust to external forcing.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…While wind, topography, or density-driven processes mostly influence the mixing and advection of the physical characteristics (temperature and salinity) of the shelf water masses, locally acting ecological processes are also determinant for biogeochemistry (Ballantyne et al, 2011). In particular, the numerous mechanisms driving phytoplankton distributions have been studied for many years, and highlight the complexity of these interactions (Martin, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plankton populations influence the survival and breeding success of higher predators of economic and conservation importance (Davis et al ., ; Menden‐Deuer & Grünbaum, ), including cod (Beaugrand et al ., ), haddock (Platt et al ., ), tuna (Fiedler & Bernard, ), marine mammals (Weise et al ., ), penguins (Boersma et al ., ), and other seabirds (Rindorf et al ., ). Spatial patchiness, and therefore synchrony in plankton, affects consumer–resource particle encounter rates, and can thereby also affect nutrient cycling and carbon export to deep ocean layers (Goldthwait et al ., ; Ballantyne et al ., ; Prairie et al ., ). Consequences of changes in synchrony for these processes may be complex (Powell & Okubo, ; Grünbaum, ; Franks, ; Ballantyne et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, transport of fluid via Darwinian drift by vertically migrating plankton (Katija and Dabiri 2009) would be expected to occur on scales similar to the distance traveled by the organisms. However, a critical next step is to understand how processes can connect across scales in order to build intuition about plankton ecology (Ballantyne et al 2011). Next, we discuss the potential for biophysical interactions to affect plankton processes at much larger scales and for large‐scale dynamics to influence processes at smaller scales (see Fig.…”
Section: Cross‐scale Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%