1981
DOI: 10.1016/0273-2297(81)90003-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The emergence of representation in search: Understanding the hider as an independent agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Fischer and Jennings (1981) and Bertenthal and Fischer (1983) argue that beginning at around 24 months, children attempt to shape their own search to match hiding strategies they detect in the experimenter. In other words, children mentally represent or map out the simple hiding strategies of the examiner, although they cannot yet represent the entire path of an invisibly displaced object.…”
Section: Examples Of Representational Skillsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Fischer and Jennings (1981) and Bertenthal and Fischer (1983) argue that beginning at around 24 months, children attempt to shape their own search to match hiding strategies they detect in the experimenter. In other words, children mentally represent or map out the simple hiding strategies of the examiner, although they cannot yet represent the entire path of an invisibly displaced object.…”
Section: Examples Of Representational Skillsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several investigators have suggested that the performance of young subjects in search tasks may reflect, in part, their understanding of the roles of hider and finder (e.g. Fischer & Jennings, 1981;Bertenthal & Fischer, 1983). There are, for example, dramatic changes between 3 and 6 years in children's understanding of how to conceal (as a hider) or guess (as a finder) which of two closed hands contains a penny (de Vries, 1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency: Representation of an Agent Moving an Object Fischer and Jennings (1981) propose an alternative analysis of representation in search that explains Corrigan's results and provides additional predictions .about the development of representation in search. In contrast to previous analyses, this proposal emphasizes the social context of object permanence tasks.…”
Section: Representation Of An Object In Searchmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, the child's search is most likely affected by both the characteristics of the object (e.g., large vs. small) and the characteristics of the screens (e.g., placement in a row vs. placement haphazardly all over the table) (Jennings, 1980). Our position is that the search task does not require children to separate agent and object but tests their ability to represent how the agent hides the object (Fischer & Jennings, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation