2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13193-011-0105-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Emergence of Surgeon-Controlled Robotic Surgery in Urologic Oncology

Abstract: The rise of robotic surgery is transforming medicine. In many ways, urology has taken charge in pioneering a new era of minimally invasive surgery with the emergence of the robot. The unprecedented dissecting precision and the dynamic three-dimensional, high definition view of the surgical field are undoubtedly revolutionizing the field of urology. These unique attributes of robotic surgery confer enormous advantages in dealing with urooncological surgery. The robotic revolution began nearly a decade ago with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimal access surgery (MAS) has been utilised in urological surgeries for several decades and is well established in prostate procedures 1,2 . Prostatectomy by MAS offers significant benefits over open surgery with shorter catheterisation time, less blood loss, less post‐operative pain, shorter hospital stay and recovery, lower rates of complications and comparable oncological outcomes 3,4 . However, MAS is associated with certain limitations, such as a lack of ergonomically designed surgical instruments, restricted reach and access of instruments, limited haptic feedback and the lack of depth perception resulting from two‐dimensional visualisation 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimal access surgery (MAS) has been utilised in urological surgeries for several decades and is well established in prostate procedures 1,2 . Prostatectomy by MAS offers significant benefits over open surgery with shorter catheterisation time, less blood loss, less post‐operative pain, shorter hospital stay and recovery, lower rates of complications and comparable oncological outcomes 3,4 . However, MAS is associated with certain limitations, such as a lack of ergonomically designed surgical instruments, restricted reach and access of instruments, limited haptic feedback and the lack of depth perception resulting from two‐dimensional visualisation 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open partial nephrectomy (PN) was first performed in 1887 but since the advent of minimally invasive surgery in urology, this approach has been favored for many renal tumors ( 2 , 3 ). The first laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) was performed in 1990 with the robot-assisted approach following approximately a decade later ( 4 - 6 ). Currently, AUA guidelines recommend PN for cT1a tumors; however, with advances in the understanding of vascular anatomy and development of advanced techniques, PN has been performed on complex, unfavorably located, larger tumors, and in solitary kidneys ( 7 - 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%