2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Emergence of Technoscientific Fields and the New Political Sociology of Science

Abstract: This chapter conceptualizes the emergence of a techno-scientific field (TSF) as a multiscalar and progressive establishment of a new set of epistemic and social rules. Drawing on science and technology studies and field theories, we design an original conceptual framework that allows us to formulate three propositions to characterize the process of emergence of a TSF. We use the emergence of synthetic biology (Synbio) as a ‘laboratory’ to test this framework. Each proposition refers to a determinant dimension … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, scientific knowledge ought not to be superior of other forms of knowledge [43]. Additionally, drawing on the constructivist insights of STS, there is a strong need for political engagement in matters of techno-science: "scientific production as a co-production process-social and epistemic, cognitive and material, cultural and natural, human and non-human" [216]. Such engagement entails much greater democratic participation of the public in the technoscientific decision-making process, as well as a larger role for STS scholars whose insights might contribute normatively to the civic enhancement of modern techno-scientific culture [217,218].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, scientific knowledge ought not to be superior of other forms of knowledge [43]. Additionally, drawing on the constructivist insights of STS, there is a strong need for political engagement in matters of techno-science: "scientific production as a co-production process-social and epistemic, cognitive and material, cultural and natural, human and non-human" [216]. Such engagement entails much greater democratic participation of the public in the technoscientific decision-making process, as well as a larger role for STS scholars whose insights might contribute normatively to the civic enhancement of modern techno-scientific culture [217,218].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERA is considered a receptive space for transactions of various capital due to its aspirations to strengthen economic competitiveness and respond to societal challenges (Paasi, 2010;Ulnicane, 2015). Following the earlier efforts of the European Commission to make the policy process more accessible to its implementers (Sbragia, 2002, p. 12), the receptiveness toward the interpretation of the field offered by Raimbault and Joly (2021) matches the particularities of the examined empirical material, namely, the eligibility of diverse entities for participation in FPs projects. Additionally, it is instrumental for a more nuanced examination of the hybrid 'regulation by networks' beyond the study of the role of EU agencies in creating and…”
Section: Practice Theory In the Context Of The European Research Areamentioning
confidence: 91%