The Emergence of the ERP Software Market between Product Innovation and Market Shaping

Abstract

Abstract:In this empirical research, the author focuses on the enterprise resource planning (ERP) software market. Based on a contingent perspective of how markets emerge and can be shaped, the author asks the research question of whether the emergence of the ERP market was a necessary, strong, or weak consequence of the product innovation of Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (SAP), which was the pioneer innovator in this specific market. This question is answered with a graph theoretical model of contingency and causality in order to measure the causality between events occurring over historical time. In this sense, the research article provides an application of the method proposed by Lehmann-Waffenschmidt. The author finds that the emergence of the ERP software market is contingent and was not predetermined; path dependencies play a big role in the way how this market segment emerged. With respect to both entrepreneurial and economic factors of relevance, the case of the SAP is far from a predetermined success story. The results are relevant for a number of reasons. First, the results indicate that instead of talking about success stories, a new perspective in market shaping can highlight a more realistic way of the contingent nature of entrepreneurial activity and product innovations. Second, the results aim to bridge the gap between marketing and the emergence of markets, as it was indicated as a research gap by recent contributions in marketing science. Third, the introduction of counterfactual events in the business history of SAP indicate a methodological innovation that has not yet been considered by marketing and entrepreneurship scholars, which may be helpful regarding recognizing patterns from the past and also regarding contingent planning for the future.

Labor Costs, Market Environment and Green Technological Innovation: Evidence from High-Pollution Firms

“…Given the externalities of technological innovation, the spillover effect must be minimized as much as possible. Technologies and market structures that are easy to control corporate spillovers are conducive to promoting corporate green innovation [48].…”

Monetary and Social Rewards for Crowdsourcing

“…Indeed, online participation facilitates collaboration with individuals [60][61][62], by overcoming participants' physical, social, cultural and geographical barriers [38,62,63]. From the inclusion of lead users, i.e., interacting with a few selected customers, the emphasis for companies is to reach out to numerous volunteer participants [64][65][66][67][68]. Depending on the specific goals that an organization aims to achieve, by leveraging crowdsourcing, we can distinguish between "crowdsourcing of inventive activities", "crowdsourcing of routine activities" and "crowdsourcing of content" [69].…”

Differential Game Analysis of Scientific Crowdsourcing on Knowledge Transfer

“…It is difficult for enterprises to rely on their own independent research, development, and technological innovation to meet market demand, and at the same time, it will generate large costs and risks. As a result, many companies tend to establish partnerships with external partners and enhance innovation value through knowledge transfer [22,23]. Witt et al [24] studied the particular features of knowledge to be transferred-overt propositional versus tacit procedural.…”

“…With Equations (14) and (22), the comparison of the knowledge transfer behavior of the initiator and solver in two different games are:…”