2007
DOI: 10.14236/ewic/hci2007.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Emotion Sampling Device (ESD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the abovementioned tools, there are more new tools released in recent years (e.g. Huisman et al, 2013;Hole & Williams, 2007).…”
Section: Design Research On Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the abovementioned tools, there are more new tools released in recent years (e.g. Huisman et al, 2013;Hole & Williams, 2007).…”
Section: Design Research On Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step in development of such a tool was to make an overview of existing tools that may to certain extent address the problems that we identified. A quick glance at the literature in the fields of human-computer interaction and consumer psychology reveals that there are many tools (Hole and Williams, 2007;Desmet, 2005;Huisman et al, 2013;Isbister et al, 2006;McDonagh et al, 2002;Bradley and Lang, 1994) that are aimed at supporting researchers in evaluation of human experience. For instance, the SAM (Bradley and Lang, 1994) that was mentioned earlier is a common instrument for measuring emotional arousal, valence, and dominance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are different from the ones discussed in Chapter 2. Assessment of emotional component of human experience is provided by such instruments as Emotion Sampling Device (Hole and Williams, 2007), Product Emotion Measurement Instrument (Desmet, 2005) or Layered Emotion Measurement Tool (Huisman et al, 2013). Traditionally, most of the approaches for capturing human experience relied on introspective reports or observations of behavior changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%