2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Emotional and Attentional Impact of Exposure to One's Own Body in Bulimia Nervosa: A Physiological View

Abstract: BackgroundBody dissatisfaction is the most relevant body image disturbance in bulimia nervosa (BN). Research has shown that viewing one's own body evokes negative thoughts and emotions in individuals with BN. However, the psychophysiological mechanisms involved in this negative reaction have not yet been clearly established. Our aim was to examine the emotional and attentional processes that are activated when patients with BN view their own bodies.MethodWe examined the effects of viewing a video of one's own … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In emotion research, the affective dimension of dominance is typically regarded as less informative compared to the classic dimensions of valence and arousal [19] , and this conception is based on the consistently high correlation between dominance and valence ratings: pleasant stimuli, including food [26] , make healthy participants feel good (high valence) and in control (high dominance), whereas unpleasant stimuli make them feel bad (low valence) and out of control (low dominance). However, data from our research group repeatedly noted [24] , [50] that dominance becomes highly informative in clinical populations: when food stimuli or one's own body are presented to subclinical (high food craving and/or high body dissatisfaction) or clinical (bulimia nervosa) populations, these groups feel less ‘in control’, worse, and more activated in comparison with healthy controls, hinting that the dimension of dominance, included in the OLAF adolescents ratings, could be valuable in future studies on the development of problematic eating patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In emotion research, the affective dimension of dominance is typically regarded as less informative compared to the classic dimensions of valence and arousal [19] , and this conception is based on the consistently high correlation between dominance and valence ratings: pleasant stimuli, including food [26] , make healthy participants feel good (high valence) and in control (high dominance), whereas unpleasant stimuli make them feel bad (low valence) and out of control (low dominance). However, data from our research group repeatedly noted [24] , [50] that dominance becomes highly informative in clinical populations: when food stimuli or one's own body are presented to subclinical (high food craving and/or high body dissatisfaction) or clinical (bulimia nervosa) populations, these groups feel less ‘in control’, worse, and more activated in comparison with healthy controls, hinting that the dimension of dominance, included in the OLAF adolescents ratings, could be valuable in future studies on the development of problematic eating patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Interestingly, it has been suggested that attentional processes could dominate the physiological responses to self‐image exposure in BN patients because of an abnormal arousal reaction with negative feelings when viewing their own bodies, probably because of an attentional bias …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on defensive behavior is also congruent with the above interpretation. Ortega-Roldán [ 47 ] found that BN patients displayed attenuated startle reflex amplitudes when viewing their own bodies in comparison with healthy controls. Given that the startle reflex is evoked when the organism has the intention of actively interacting with the environment [ 27 ], its inhibition in BN also supports the view of a passive-defensive coping style.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%