2007
DOI: 10.3764/aja.111.4.693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Emperor's New Clothes? The Utility of Identity in Roman Archaeology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…101. There is now a very large literature on the inadequacies of Romanisation, notably Hill (2001, and Pitts (2007). 102.…”
Section: For This Text (And Its Contextual Understanding) See Sommer mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…101. There is now a very large literature on the inadequacies of Romanisation, notably Hill (2001, and Pitts (2007). 102.…”
Section: For This Text (And Its Contextual Understanding) See Sommer mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For examples of studies of identity in Roman archaeology see Laurence & Berry (1998);Gardner (2007a);and Hales & Hodos (2010). Pitts (2007) provides some critique of this phenomenon. 105.…”
Section: For This Text (And Its Contextual Understanding) See Sommer mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being a core theme in many areas of archaeological research, the term is rarely explicitly defined or adequately theorized (see McClain 2012, 142-3 in relation to medieval archaeology and Pitts (2007) in relation to Roman archaeology). As Pitts (2007,700) argues without such a definition, studies can become as limited as culture historical approaches, identifying groups not through assemblages of objects, but characterising them through their social practices.…”
Section: Introduction [A]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pits u ovome vidi opasnost od uvođenja koncepta identiteta kao nove paradigme kojom se delovi materijalne kulture vezuju za određene identitete, bez argumentovanja logike koja stoji iza njih, i da se pritom stvara slika koja (opet) više govori o savremenim kontekstima i perspektivama istraživača nego o temi kojom se bave. Da bi se izbegao ovakav rezultat, potrebno je pre svega razraditi teorijska polazišta koja jasno definišu upotrebu termina, ali i metodologiju kojom se neka materijalna kultura vezuje za izvesna identitetska određenja (Pitts 2007, Mihajlović 2012.…”
Section: Arheologija Identiteta I Debata O Romanizacijiunclassified
“…Iako, kao što Pits kaže (Pitts 2007), u naše interpretacije prošlosti učitavamo naše svakodnevne stavove i gledišta i po tome se ne razlikujemo mnogo od Momzena i Haverfilda sa kraja 19. i početka 20. veka ma koliko naši stavovi bili "savremeniji" i promišljeniji, najvažnije je biti svestan tih okolnosti, svih prednosti i mana, i biti spreman napustiti neke stavove ukoliko se pokažu nepouzdanim. Samo stalnim preispitivanjem stavova, metodologije i rezultata možemo biti sigurni da smo na pravom putu za rešavanje problema.…”
Section: Postkolonijalna Perspektiva: Kreolizacija I Globalizacijaunclassified