2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-019-1405-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Empirical Implication of Conducting a Chree Analysis Using Data from Isolated Neutron Monitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FD detection program developed by Okike and Umahi (; Paper 2 hereafter) is adapted and employed for event selection in the present work. While the algorithm was tested using CR data for 1 year (year 2005) in Paper 2, two solar cycles (22 (1986–1996) and 23 (1996–2008)) are used here to further validate the algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The FD detection program developed by Okike and Umahi (; Paper 2 hereafter) is adapted and employed for event selection in the present work. While the algorithm was tested using CR data for 1 year (year 2005) in Paper 2, two solar cycles (22 (1986–1996) and 23 (1996–2008)) are used here to further validate the algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the indications of Chronis () and Scott et al () on the possible influence of other planetary variables on lightning and meteorological data, we examined the relations between the FDs and lightning and other solar and meteorological data presented in Tables and . The FD key dates and magnitudes in Tables and could provoke a lot of discussions with regard to the use of data from isolated neutron monitor (Okike & Umahi, ) as well as the nature of the FDs. Although we do not intend to conduct individual examination of the FDs, a close inspection of the two tables shows that 14 out of the 30 (i.e., 47%) FDs in Table defined a different date from those of Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations