2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The employee–organization relationship: Where do we go from here?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
281
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 372 publications
(291 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
281
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The employment relationship literature has gained huge popularity in the last decades (Coyle-Shapiro & Shore, 2007). The employment relationship is conceptualized in terms of psychological contracts between employees and their organizations, which have been found to have a positive impact on job attitudes and work behaviors (see e.g., Bal, De Lange, Jansen, & Van der Velde, 2008;Zhao, Wayne, Glibkowski, & Bravo, 2007).…”
Section: Psychological Contracts As a Mediator Between Work Centralitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The employment relationship literature has gained huge popularity in the last decades (Coyle-Shapiro & Shore, 2007). The employment relationship is conceptualized in terms of psychological contracts between employees and their organizations, which have been found to have a positive impact on job attitudes and work behaviors (see e.g., Bal, De Lange, Jansen, & Van der Velde, 2008;Zhao, Wayne, Glibkowski, & Bravo, 2007).…”
Section: Psychological Contracts As a Mediator Between Work Centralitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breach has been linked to a number of downward adjustments in important employees' attitudes and behaviours; for example trust, satisfaction, commitment, organizational citizenship behaviour and in-role performance (see Zhao et al, 2007 for a metaanalysis). The focus of most psychological contract research has thus been on the contingent interplay between exchanged resources, building on the 'inducementscontributions' model of the exchange relationship (Coyle-Shapiro and Shore, 2007). In addition, some attention has been paid to the content and features of the psychological contract, mainly with reference to the distinction between transactional and relational contract types (Taylor and Tekleab, 2004;Sels, Janssens and Van den Brande, 2004), and to the type of reciprocity governing the exchange relationship (Parzefall, 2008).…”
Section: The Concept Of Psychological Contract Hrm and Managerial Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exchange starts with one party giving a benefit to another. If the recipient reciprocates, and consequently a series of beneficial exchanges occurs and feelings of mutual obligation between the parties are created [20]. A broad notion of reciprocity encompasses a feeling of an obligation to repay favorable treatment.…”
Section: Theoretical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21], defined employees' obligation feeling as a prescriptive belief regarding whether one should care about the organization's well-being and should help the organization reach its goals. According to [20], reciprocation in social relationships becomes stronger when both partners are willing to provide resources valuable to the other. Whereas employees value beneficial treatment, employers seek loyalty and dedication [21] Positive actions directed at employees by the Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY organization are argued to contribute to the establishment of high-quality exchange relationships and high employee performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%