2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The employment effect of stricter rules for eligibility for DI: Evidence from a natural experiment in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
106
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kreuger and Meyer 2002). Several studies have shown that persons progress from the unemployment insurance into the sickness insurance when the replacement rate is higher in the latter (Henningsen, 2006;Autor and Duggan, 2006;Karlstrom, Palme andSvensson, 2007 andEuropean Economic Advisory Group, 2007). In Sweden, the sickness insurance is more generous than the unemployment insurance.…”
Section: Sickness and Unemployment Insurancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kreuger and Meyer 2002). Several studies have shown that persons progress from the unemployment insurance into the sickness insurance when the replacement rate is higher in the latter (Henningsen, 2006;Autor and Duggan, 2006;Karlstrom, Palme andSvensson, 2007 andEuropean Economic Advisory Group, 2007). In Sweden, the sickness insurance is more generous than the unemployment insurance.…”
Section: Sickness and Unemployment Insurancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the ERA implies that the choice set of older workers is reduced and that the employment reaction of those who would have chosen to retire depends on the relative attractiveness of the remaining options. There is a large literature that analyzing program substitution e ects in the context of pension reforms (e.g., Duggan et al, 2007;Karlström et al, 2008;Li and Maestas, 2008;Coe and Haverstick, 2010;Staubli, 2011;Staubli and Zweimüller, 2013;Borghans et al, 2014;Atalay and Barrett, 2015;Inderbitzin et al, 2016). However, the existing evidence on the e ectiveness of increasing the ERA and program substitution is mixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other studies that rely on difference-in-differences (DID) across age groups to identify effects of more stringent criteria at application for DI (Karlström et al 2008;Staubli 2011), we adjust for the difference between the age groups in the outcome trend over a period prior to the reform. This trend-adjusted DID (Bell et al 1999) eliminates age-specific trends, as well as period effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%