2011
DOI: 10.4236/me.2011.25099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Employment of Young Graduates in the Period 2000-2010: A Comparison between Six European Countries

Abstract: The paper aims to assess the relative importance of participation and unemployment and the interaction between them in affecting the evolution of employment rates of young graduates in selected European countries. The Taylor formula is used to read the behaviour of employment rates in terms of movements in activity and unemployment rates. Using this analytical procedure, the comparison between the selected countries underscores two aspects in particular: the progressive isolation of Italy, due to the poor resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we find some authors who underscore the unforeseeable consequences of a constant increase in the percentage of the population with higher education [50]. Meanwhile, others highlight the importance of structural factors, such as heterogeneity within the labor markets in each country [51]⎯socioeconomic imbalances between the north and south [14], or the types of educational programs and fields of study, as well as personal factors; gender and economic standing of a graduate's family [52]; level of parental education, competencies at the time of graduation, employment conditions⎯economic sector, size of the organization, and the experience after graduation [53]. Other opinions in this regard, which serve to balance the debate, point out that going through university tends to iron out class differences soon after graduation, thus arguing that any initial social differences do not represent a discriminating factor in terms of employability [54].…”
Section: Quantification Of Employabilitymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, we find some authors who underscore the unforeseeable consequences of a constant increase in the percentage of the population with higher education [50]. Meanwhile, others highlight the importance of structural factors, such as heterogeneity within the labor markets in each country [51]⎯socioeconomic imbalances between the north and south [14], or the types of educational programs and fields of study, as well as personal factors; gender and economic standing of a graduate's family [52]; level of parental education, competencies at the time of graduation, employment conditions⎯economic sector, size of the organization, and the experience after graduation [53]. Other opinions in this regard, which serve to balance the debate, point out that going through university tends to iron out class differences soon after graduation, thus arguing that any initial social differences do not represent a discriminating factor in terms of employability [54].…”
Section: Quantification Of Employabilitymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Experts and scholars have long carried out studies regarding factors influencing college graduate employment (Chen & Liu, 2015;Gonzalez, 2000;Huang, 2008). Some scholars have analyzed the situation of young college graduates in the labor market by examining the impact of gender (Potestio, 2011;Rotkowski, 2003). Chinese researchers have also considered contradictions between the training of higher education and the needs of economic and social development, job market and employer selection, student interests, and social structure (Chen, 2005;Li, 2017).…”
Section: Employment Opportunity In Human Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%