The end of media logics? On algorithms and agency

Abstract

We argue that the design of algorithms is an outcome rather than a replacement of media logics, and ultimately we advance this argument by connecting human agency to media logics. This theoretical contribution builds on the notion that technology, particularly algorithms are non-neutral, arguing for a stronger focus on the agency that goes into designing and programming them. We reflect on the limits of algorithmic agency and lay out the role of algorithms and agency for the dimensions and elements of network media logic. The article concludes with addressing questions of power, discussing algorithmic agency from both meso and macro perspectives.

Algorithmic social media use and its relationship to attitude reinforcement and issue-specific political participation – The case of the 2015 European immigration movements

“…The content selection mechanism of social media, which displays content in users' personalized newsfeed based on previous online behavior, is the defining characteristic that explains why these platforms specifically are believed to foster exposure to politically likeminded viewpoints (Garrett, 2009). Although users can initially curate their social media content (Thorson & Wells, 2015), most decisions about what people get to see rely on algorithms (Diakopoulos, 2019;Klinger & Svensson, 2018).…”

Social Bots in Election Campaigns: Theoretical, Empirical, and Methodological Implications

“…While some authors understand bots as "automated social actors" (Abokhodair, Yoo & McDonald, 2015, p. 2), the question of technology and non-human agency is theoretically more complex. Technologies designed and programmed by humans embody social values and business models; they are encoded with human intentions and have limited agency of their own (Klinger & Svensson, 2018). Their behaviour is human-like and human-guided, which makes them human-dependent rather than autonomous actors.…”

Communicating Veganism: Evolving Theoretical Challenges to Mainstreaming Ideas

“…Placing social consciousness in a cybernetic dimension can serve as greatly relevant for considering how socio-informational positioning occurs in these spaces, and how they differ from social positioning in other media dimensions. If the logics of these systems result in particularly engineered parameters for information exposure, the communication of ideas suffer from both conventional institutional dynamics as well as novel ones from algorithmic operations (Klinger and Svensson, 2018). Given this, the emergent effects of this complex interaction of conventional media content design, and algorithmic information processing, can be seen as a combination of intended targeting and predictive targeting.…”