2013
DOI: 10.1080/14616742.2012.741429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The End of the Line

Abstract: The transmission and interpretation of information generated from full-body scanners is increasingly becoming a site of contestation in airport security queues all over the world. Body scanning technology raises questions surrounding the rights of governments to images of human bodies, acts of surveillance and to what extent technologies such as full-body scanners are helping to make us more 'secure' -or are disadvantaging particular groups of bodies. We examine the use of full-body scanners and their conseque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(CheckinAgent03, female, 20s) Perhaps over-confidently, Jakarta's staff see human profiling practices as more holistic and trustworthy than self-check-in or a machine checking identity documents, as these technologies might miss making intuitive connections and associations. Of course, there are the commonly gendered techno-mediated visual and physical practices of sexist, and cissexist forms of airport security scrutiny that produce the passenger as "untravellable" (Redden and Terry 2013;Sjoberg 2015), especially as they express imperfect human proclivities and judgements within, through, and especially at the fringes of human-machine interfaces at airports. In Jakarta, these technologies, it seems, cannot be solely relied upon, but draw from skilled embodied sensitivities usually cast as female capacities-especially intuition which has been characterised in very different but in caring and also diagnostic labour practices (James 1989).…”
Section: Pre-empting Risks: Activating Doggy Smellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(CheckinAgent03, female, 20s) Perhaps over-confidently, Jakarta's staff see human profiling practices as more holistic and trustworthy than self-check-in or a machine checking identity documents, as these technologies might miss making intuitive connections and associations. Of course, there are the commonly gendered techno-mediated visual and physical practices of sexist, and cissexist forms of airport security scrutiny that produce the passenger as "untravellable" (Redden and Terry 2013;Sjoberg 2015), especially as they express imperfect human proclivities and judgements within, through, and especially at the fringes of human-machine interfaces at airports. In Jakarta, these technologies, it seems, cannot be solely relied upon, but draw from skilled embodied sensitivities usually cast as female capacities-especially intuition which has been characterised in very different but in caring and also diagnostic labour practices (James 1989).…”
Section: Pre-empting Risks: Activating Doggy Smellmentioning
confidence: 99%