2004
DOI: 10.1086/380562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The End of the MACHO Era: Limits on Halo Dark Matter from Stellar Halo Wide Binaries

Abstract: We simulate the evolution of halo wide binaries in the presence of the massive compact halo objects (MACHOs) and compare our results to the sample of wide binaries in a companion paper. The observed distribution is well fitted by a single power law for angular separations, 3B5 < Á < 900 00 , whereas the simulated distributions show a break in the power law whose location depends on the MACHO mass and density. This allows us to place upper limits on the density of MACHOs as a function of their assumed mass. At … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
211
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
211
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be possible to improve limits in the range 10 M < M < 100 M by combining the results presented here with the MACHO high mass results (Alcock et al 2001b). This may narrow the small remaining allowed macho mass range between the range excluded by microlensing and that excluded by the abundance of halo wide binary stars (Yoo et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be possible to improve limits in the range 10 M < M < 100 M by combining the results presented here with the MACHO high mass results (Alcock et al 2001b). This may narrow the small remaining allowed macho mass range between the range excluded by microlensing and that excluded by the abundance of halo wide binary stars (Yoo et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, the EROS (Lasserre et al 2000; Goldman et al 2002;Tisserand et al 2006), OGLE (Udalski et al 1994), MOA (Muraki et al 1999) and SuperMACHO (Becker et al 2005) teams have monitored millions of stars during several years in both the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) to search for microlensing events. Most of them have challenged the results of the MACHO experiment -see, for instance, Yoo et al (2004) and references therein. In addition, there have been claims that white dwarfs could be the stellar objects reported in the Hubble Deep Field (Ibata et al 1999;Méndez & Minniti 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape of their separation distribution, in particular towards the most extreme, widest separations, should therefore allow constraints on the mass and frequency of the disruptive perturbers (Retterer & King 1982), as well as to estimate the age of a population (Poveda & Allen 2004). Wide binary-based MACHO constraints have been placed (but subsequently criticised) by several authors (Bahcall et al 1985a;Weinberg et al 1987;Weinberg 1990;Wasserman & Weinberg 1991;Yoo et al 2004;Quinn et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%