The Endurant Stent Graft System: 15-month follow-up report in patients with challenging abdominal aortic anatomies

Hyhlik‐Dürr, A.; Weber, Tim Frederik; Kotelis, D.; Rengier, Fabian; Gahlen, Johannes; Böck, Stefanie; Köhler, Jürgen; C, Ratusinski; Böckler, Dittmar

doi:10.1007/s00423-011-0806-7

Cited by 17 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The continuous improvement of available endografts and delivery systems has increased the indications for EVAR in patients with AAA [7], [12], [13]. The broader spectrum of indications using state-of-the-art stent-grafts is particularly beneficial for patients with difficult aortoiliac anatomy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thereby, reinterventions due to a persistent or recurrent perfusion of the aneurysm are prevented. Moreover, improved stent-grafts can also be used for EVAR in patients with difficult aortoiliac anatomies such as short proximal necks, severely angulated infrarenal aortas, and kinking or heavy calcification of pelvic arteries [4], [7], [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Optimizing the physical and mechanical properties of both, the endograft itself and the delivery system has further increased the range of indications compared with its predecessor [7], [9], [10]. This has been accomplished by forming sinusoidal M-shaped main body stents for greater radial force and flexibility as well as reducing the diameter of the hydrophilic coated delivery system.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Technical and Clinical Outcome of Talent versus Endurant Endografts for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe technical evolution of endografts for the interventional management of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has allowed a continuous expansion of indications. This study compares the established Talent endograft with its successor, the Endurant endograft, taking individual aortoiliac anatomy into account.MethodsFrom June 2007 to December 2010, 35 patients with AAA were treated with a Talent endograft (33 men) and 36 patients with an Endurant endograft (34 men). Aortoiliac anatomy was evaluated in detail using preinterventional computed tomography angiography. The 30-day outcome of both groups were compared regarding technical and clinical success as well as complications including endoleaks.ResultsThe Endurant group included more patients with unfavorable anatomy (kinking of pelvic arteries, p = 0.017; shorter proximal neck, p = 0.084). Primary technical success was 91.4% in the Talent group and 100% in the Endurant group (p = 0.115). Type 1 endoleaks occurred in 5.7% of patients in the Talent group and in 2.8% of those in the Endurant group (p = 0.614). Type 3 endoleaks only occurred in the Talent group (2.9% of patients; p = 0.493). Type 2 endoleaks were significantly less common in the Endurant group than in the Talent group (8.3% versus 28.6%; p = 0.035). Rates of major and minor complications were not significantly different between both groups. Primary clinical success was significantly better in the Endurant group (97.2%) than in the Talent group (80.0%) (p = 0.028).ConclusionEndurant endografts appear to have better technical and clinical outcome in patients with difficult aortoiliac anatomy, significantly reducing the occurrence of type 2 endoleaks.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Technical and Clinical Outcome of Talent versus Endurant Endografts for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…22,23,25,26 Bastos Gonçalves et al 22 retrospectively compared 45 elective patients with angulated necks vs. 65 matched controls with non-angulated neck anatomy. There was a 100% technical success rate.…”

Section: ¤ ¤mentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Results From a Canadian Multicenter Prospective Registry of the Endurant Stent Graft for Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Kvinlaug

Lawlor

Forbes

et al. 2012

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Endoleak formation is an important and frequent complication after endovascular thoracic or abdominal aortic repairs, 7,8 occurring in approximately one fourth of patients. 9 Endoleaks can arise at the proximal (type Ia) or distal (type Ib) attachment of the stent-graft or be due to patent collaterals (type II), device failure (type III), or fabric porosity (type IV).…”

Section: ¤ ¤mentioning

confidence: 99%

Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Evaluation of a Single-Acquisition CTA Protocol Using a Prebolus

Bucourt¹,

Mühler²,

Kröncke³

et al. 2011

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Endurant Stent Graft System: 15-month follow-up report in patients with challenging abdominal aortic anatomies

Abstract: Early and 15-month results with the Endurant stent graft in patients with challenging aortic anatomies are encouraging.

Cited by 17 publications

References 34 publications

Technical and Clinical Outcome of Talent versus Endurant Endografts for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Technical and Clinical Outcome of Talent versus Endurant Endografts for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Early Results From a Canadian Multicenter Prospective Registry of the Endurant Stent Graft for Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Evaluation of a Single-Acquisition CTA Protocol Using a Prebolus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About