1980
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/13/22/017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The energy loss of energetic ions moving near a solid surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
0
4

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
51
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For particle trajectories inside the solid (z > 0), Eq. (9.13) reproduces the result first obtained by Nuñez et al [316]. Outside the solid, the energy loss is dominated by the excitation of surface plasmons at ω s .…”
Section: Planar Surfacesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For particle trajectories inside the solid (z > 0), Eq. (9.13) reproduces the result first obtained by Nuñez et al [316]. Outside the solid, the energy loss is dominated by the excitation of surface plasmons at ω s .…”
Section: Planar Surfacesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Proceeding as before, one can calculate from (2.14) the total energy loss probability per unit length [22,23]. It is given by:…”
Section: X14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar calculations have been done using a simple dielectric model, 20 where only excitation of a low-energy two-dimensional (2D) plasmon was considered, or by using the hydrodynamic model, 21 where the wake potential in carbon nanotubes has been investigated. Here we are in the framework of more general theories established a long time ago to investigate the energy loss and wake potential of moving ions close to a solid surface 22 or the wake potential and self-energy of a particle moving near a metallic surface 23,24 by using simple plasmon-pole or semiclassical approximations. 25 In this work the response function and the induced potential are obtained using the first-principles time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) to calculate the dynamical response function and the energy-loss rate, where we include contributions of all electronic excitations up to 25 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%