2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The energy performance of dwellings of Dutch non-profit housing associations: Modelling actual energy consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a broad consensus in the literature that the two main causes of the performance gap are the “prebound effect” and “rebound effect” (Sunikka-Blank & Galvin, 2012 ). As van der Bent et al ( 2021 ) summarized: “the prebound effect means a lower energy consumption than theoretically assumed in buildings with a poor energy performance because inhabitants do not heat the whole dwelling. The rebound effect means that dwellings with a high energy performance use more energy than theoretically assumed, because inhabitants think that the dwelling is energy efficient”.…”
Section: Discussion On the Two Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a broad consensus in the literature that the two main causes of the performance gap are the “prebound effect” and “rebound effect” (Sunikka-Blank & Galvin, 2012 ). As van der Bent et al ( 2021 ) summarized: “the prebound effect means a lower energy consumption than theoretically assumed in buildings with a poor energy performance because inhabitants do not heat the whole dwelling. The rebound effect means that dwellings with a high energy performance use more energy than theoretically assumed, because inhabitants think that the dwelling is energy efficient”.…”
Section: Discussion On the Two Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the different studies are summed, all characteristics that occur in more than 60% of the papers are indicated in green, and all characteristics that occur in more than 40% of the papers are indicated in orange. A second type is the archetype approach [20][21][22][23]27,32,[38][39][40][41][42][43]46,48,49]. In this approach, the buildings are represented by archetype buildings based on a classification system.…”
Section: Bottom-up Stock Modelling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, these can be used to fill the data gaps of building parameters, occupancy, or energy use. The study of van der Bent et al [39] even reveals that prediction models using machine learning algorithms to define building parameters and energy use might achieve a higher accuracy than theoretical building energy models using energy simulations. However, theoretical models are necessary to simulate future scenarios.…”
Section: Bottom-up Stock Modelling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%