2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The enhanced efficiency to 3.6% based on organic dye as donor and Si/TiO2 acceptor bulk hetero-junction solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 6-311++G(d,p)(5D,7F) basis set was employed to predict the molecular structure and vibrational wave numbers [26][27][28][29][30][31]. Molecular geometries were fully optimized by Berny's optimization algorithm using redundant internal coordinates.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 6-311++G(d,p)(5D,7F) basis set was employed to predict the molecular structure and vibrational wave numbers [26][27][28][29][30][31]. Molecular geometries were fully optimized by Berny's optimization algorithm using redundant internal coordinates.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wave number values computed at the HartreeFock level contain known systematic errors due to the negligence of electron correlation [24] and a scaling factor value of 0.8929 is used for the wavenumbers obtained by HF method. The DFT hybrid B3LYP functional and SDD methods tend to overestimate the fundamental modes; therefore scaling factor of 0.9613 has to be used for obtaining a considerably better agreement with experimental data [24][25][26][27]. The Stuttgart/Dresden effective core potential basis set (SDD) [28] was chosen particularly because of its advantage of doing faster calculations with relatively better accuracy and structures [29].…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study, we found the measured V oc 0.53 and 0.60 V for 2-{4-[2-(4-hydroxy benzylidene)hydrazino]phenyl}ethylene-1,1,2-tricarbonitrile (dye2) and hydrazone 2-{4-[2-(2-hydroxybenzylidene)hydrazi no]phenyl}ethylene-1,1,2-tricarbonitrile (dye1) with efficiencies of 3.58% and 2.76%, respectively. The superior efficiency in hydrazone dye2 was observed due to the larger J sc and FF values (Al-Sehemi et al, 2014). On the other hand, it is expected that higher LHE and DG inject would lead to result in efficient devices due to the improved J sc .…”
Section: Electronic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%