2016
DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_00867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Enhanced Rise and Delayed Fall of Memory in a Model of Synaptic Integration: Extension to Discrete State Synapses

Abstract: Integrate-and-express models of synaptic plasticity propose that synapses may act as low-pass filters, integrating synaptic plasticity induction signals in order to discern trends before expressing synaptic plasticity. We have previously shown that synaptic filtering strongly controls destabilising fluctuations in developmental models. When applied to palimpsest memory systems that learn new memories by forgetting old ones, we have also shown that with binarystrength synapses, integrative synapses lead to an i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that 768/π 4 ≈ 7.88 ≈ 8 and therefore also 32/π 4 ≈ 0.33 ≈ 1/3, so these SNR lifetimes are quite insensitive to the choice of Ω. We have obtained the results for C & L before (Elliott, 2016a). The C & L model has also been extensively studied by previous authors, although purely in an SNR context.…”
Section: Snr Memory Lifetimesmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that 768/π 4 ≈ 7.88 ≈ 8 and therefore also 32/π 4 ≈ 0.33 ≈ 1/3, so these SNR lifetimes are quite insensitive to the choice of Ω. We have obtained the results for C & L before (Elliott, 2016a). The C & L model has also been extensively studied by previous authors, although purely in an SNR context.…”
Section: Snr Memory Lifetimesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…An MFPT approach to memory lifetimes overcomes many of the difficulties of an SNR approach and shows that the latter is only asymptotically valid in the limit of a large number of synapses (Elliott, 2014). We have also observed in simulation that conditions on the number of states of synaptic strength that appear to optimise SNR memory lifetimes are not respected by MFPT lifetimes, suggesting that such optimality conditions are artifacts of the SNR approach (Elliott, 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Conversely, simple stochastic updater synapses that lack internal states are relatively easy to study. By integrating out internal synaptic states and working purely in terms of transitions in synaptic strength, we have shown in earlier work that we can often derive exact results that would otherwise be quite difficult, if not impossible, to obtain by other means (Elliott, 2010b(Elliott, , 2016a. Furthermore, this change of perspective often affords far greater theoretical insight by stripping away the microscopic details and bringing into sharp focus the macroscopic dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…An examination of MFPT-defined memory lifetimes with complex synapses reveals that network-size effects or optimality conditions are absent, in contrast to memory lifetimes defined by SNRs (Elliott, 2016a). Although we have only examined this issue with filter-based synapses here, this difference between MFPT and SNR memory lifetimes appears to be present in other models of complex synapses (unpublished observations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation