2005
DOI: 10.1119/1.1830501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The enigma of nonholonomic constraints

Abstract: The problems associated with the modification of Hamilton's principle to cover nonholonomic constraints by the application of the multiplier theorem of variational calculus are discussed. The reason for the problems is subtle and is discussed, together with the reason why the proper account of nonholonomic constraints is outside the scope of Hamilton's variational principle. However, linear velocity constraints remain within the scope of D'Alembert's principle. A careful and comprehensive analysis facilitates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equations in Hamiltonian form are useful for determining phase space compressibility and applying linear response theory. 5 However, as the Principle of Least Action is known to give incorrect equations of motions for some constraints, 27 it may not be applicable to obtain a generally valid localized momentum constraint. Gauss's principle of least constraint is used to verify the Principle of Least Action formulation, as in Flannery,30 because it is applicable to holonomic as well as non-holonomic constraints.…”
Section: B Localized Momentum Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The equations in Hamiltonian form are useful for determining phase space compressibility and applying linear response theory. 5 However, as the Principle of Least Action is known to give incorrect equations of motions for some constraints, 27 it may not be applicable to obtain a generally valid localized momentum constraint. Gauss's principle of least constraint is used to verify the Principle of Least Action formulation, as in Flannery,30 because it is applicable to holonomic as well as non-holonomic constraints.…”
Section: B Localized Momentum Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the constraint expressed in terms of surface fluxes, as in Eq. (27), is the required starting point to derive an accurate flux coupling. Equation (27) can be interpreted as a constraint on all the surface fluxes, and, therefore, the flux coupling methodology of Flekkøy et al 22 is a special case, where computational fluid dynamics (CFD) pressure and advection are applied at the top CV surface only and no molecular terms are removed.…”
Section: The Constraint Equation In Terms Of Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although some interpretation problems are associated to non-holonomic constraints [111], and they are known to not accept in general a closed Hamiltonian formalism [112,113,114], they are perfectly valid in the algorithmic sense discussed before (i.e., as a tool to define the integration region in which the integrated quantity is non-negligible in equilibrium statistical mechanics). In fact, when their form is linear in the velocities, as it is the case of eq.…”
Section: Flexible Vs Hard Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%