2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01778.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The enteropathogenic E. coli effector EspH promotes actin pedestal formation and elongation via WASP-interacting protein (WIP)

Abstract: Summary Enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EPEC and EHEC) are diarrheagenic pathogens that colonize the gut mucosa via attaching‐and‐effacing lesion formation. EPEC and EHEC utilize a type III secretion system (T3SS) to translocate effector proteins that subvert host cell signalling to sustain colonization and multiplication. EspH, a T3SS effector that modulates actin dynamics, was implicated in the elongation of the EHEC actin pedestals. In this study we found that EspH is necessary for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like Map, EspF localizes to mitochondria (114) and has been shown to disrupt tight junctions (115), while EspG alters host cytoskeletal components through its interaction with tubulin (116). EspZ promotes host cell survival (117), whereas EspH affects filopodium formation, participates in actin signaling during pedestal formation (118), and acts as a RhoGEF inhibitor (119). Both EspH and EspB are capable of inhibiting phagocytosis of EPEC by macrophages (120,121).…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like Map, EspF localizes to mitochondria (114) and has been shown to disrupt tight junctions (115), while EspG alters host cytoskeletal components through its interaction with tubulin (116). EspZ promotes host cell survival (117), whereas EspH affects filopodium formation, participates in actin signaling during pedestal formation (118), and acts as a RhoGEF inhibitor (119). Both EspH and EspB are capable of inhibiting phagocytosis of EPEC by macrophages (120,121).…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51,52 EspH has been shown to promote actin polymerization and this function is inhibited by a dominant negative isoform of WASP-interacting protein (WIP). 53 WIP binds to N-WASP WH1 domain to inhibit the EspH activity in actin dynamics. On the other hand, EspH recruits N-WASP and Arp2/3 to the site of bacterial attachment.…”
Section: Manipulation Of Host Cellular and Subcellular Targets By E mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the EspC-FAK interaction in vitro allowed us to detect amino-and carboxy-terminal degradation subproducts by using antibodies against either of these ends, suggesting that further FAK degradation in the cells could be occurring by means of other host proteases. It is worth mentioning that EspC is the most prominent protein secreted by EPEC before the T3SS translocator proteins (25), and unlike other cytotoxic LEE effectors, such as EspF, Map, and EspH (32,43,44), EspC is not subject to the T3SS timing for its secretion (45). On the other hand, the paxillin 35-kDa subproduct detected during EPEC infection, which appears to be derived from ␤-paxillin, was not detected during the EspC-paxillin interaction in vitro, where the main degraded isoform was ␣-paxillin.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%