The Entropy Conundrum: A Solution Proposal

Abstract

don't know the code used for the message you can't tell the difference between an information-rich message and a random jumble of letters. This is an entropy conundrum to solve. Even the most sophisticated instrumentation system is completely unable to reliably discriminate so called "random noise" from any combinatorially optimized encoded message, which CICT called "deterministic noise". Entropy fundamental concept crosses so many scientific and research areas, but, unfortunately, even across so many different disciplines, scientists have not yet worked out a definitive solution to the fundamental problem of the logical relationship between human experience and knowledge extraction. So, both classic concept of entropy and system random noise should be revisited deeply at theoretical and operational level. A convenient CICT solution proposal will be presented.

Entropy, Decoherence and Spacetime Splitting

“…The modern science is still founded on the idea of a total separation between the observing-subject and the Reality, assumed to be completely independent from the first one [24]. The "objectivity" of classical physics (Science 1.0, [23]) is fundamentally linked to the knowledge of an object moving in the 1-dimensional time and the 3-dimensional space. The central role of the spacetime (ST) in four dimensions was not altered by the two relativity theories of Einstein, restricted and general, that constitute the apogee of classical physics.…”

“…But in a physical measurement we get obviously just one single result. This abolition, via the measurement process, of the plurality of possible values of an observable quantity had an obscure meaning but it already clearly indicated the existence of a new type of causality [23]. Seven decades after QM was born, the nature of this new type of causality was clarified thanks to a rigorous theoretical result, the Bell's theorem, and also to high precision experiments.…”

“…It is based on focus on the unknown, not the production of mathematical certainties based on weak assumptions or probabilities. Therefore, sometime the "probabilistic veil" can be very opaque computationally, and misplaced precision leads to information opacity, fuzziness, irreversibility, chaos, complexity and confusion [23]. Thus, one of the key questions in understanding the quantum-classical transition is what happens to the superposition as you go up that atoms-to-apple scale.…”

“…Exactly when and how does "both/and" become "either/or" [22]? Decoherence [23] offers a way to understand classicality as emergent from within the quantum formalism, and the classical world no longer sits in opposition to quantum mechanics, but is demanded by it. In previous paper, we presented a modelling and computational solution to system decoherence transition and entropy conundrum by computational information conservation theory (CICT) [23].…”

“…Decoherence [23] offers a way to understand classicality as emergent from within the quantum formalism, and the classical world no longer sits in opposition to quantum mechanics, but is demanded by it. In previous paper, we presented a modelling and computational solution to system decoherence transition and entropy conundrum by computational information conservation theory (CICT) [23]. In present paper, we focus our attention on the relativistic electrodynamics observer space-time split (STS) case (previous point A) supported by spacetime algebra (STA) representation scheme and the proposal of a pre-spatial arithmetic scheme (previous point B) supported by CICT.…”