2014
DOI: 10.1080/21624887.2013.856197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The environment and emancipation in critical security studies: the case of the Canadian Arctic

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the current coordinator of the vault, Åsmund Asdal, and Luigi Guarino, placing the SGSV there is also a reflection of the geopolitical trust and affection for Norway: 'Offering the world a safe place for seeds is in accordance with long standing Norwegian policies for supporting biodiversity conservation, and stakeholders all over the world trust that Norway will take good care of the seeds' (Asdal and Guarino, 2018: 391). It also aligns with other narratives of the far northand Scandinavia in particularas the safest place on Earth (Harrington and Lecavalier, 2014;LaFauci, 2018).…”
Section: The Politics Of the Doomsday Vaultsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the current coordinator of the vault, Åsmund Asdal, and Luigi Guarino, placing the SGSV there is also a reflection of the geopolitical trust and affection for Norway: 'Offering the world a safe place for seeds is in accordance with long standing Norwegian policies for supporting biodiversity conservation, and stakeholders all over the world trust that Norway will take good care of the seeds' (Asdal and Guarino, 2018: 391). It also aligns with other narratives of the far northand Scandinavia in particularas the safest place on Earth (Harrington and Lecavalier, 2014;LaFauci, 2018).…”
Section: The Politics Of the Doomsday Vaultsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This article adds to these fledgling discussions by exploring how imaginaries of security in the Anthropocene are materialised. This adds important contextualisation to the literature on Anthropocene security, which to date has mostly focused on conceptual critiques of dominant disciplinary paradigms rather than specific practices (Dalby, 2020; Harrington and Shearing, 2017; McDonald, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant transformations in indigenous politics in the circumpolar region may herald the emergence of new, transnational and indigenised forms of sovereignty and political organisation (Wilson 2007; Ejesiak 2013; Shadian 2014), including possibilities for decolonised forms of political community that reflect indigenous priorities and dispositions towards culture, resources, and sustainability. Reimagining Arctic futures invites questioning whether state-driven Arctic security policies that prioritise militarism and resource extraction can actually sustain the regional ecology or support the wellbeing of Arctic inhabitants (Broadhead 2010; Smith 2010; Greaves 2012; Nickels 2013; Harrington and Lecavalier 2014). In their place, we might imagine an Arctic in which extractive activities most responsible for damaging the Arctic ecology through climate change and local contamination are replaced with economic activities that support the priorities and traditions of Arctic inhabitants themselves.…”
Section: Towards Critical Environmental Security In the Arcticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSS concept has diverged from TSS in the existing literature regarding emancipation, societal security, and ethics (Aradau et al, 2014;Nunes, 2012;Bourne & Bulley, 2011;Harrington & Lecavalier, 2014;Waever, 2012;Booth, 2005). Furthermore, fear, risk, and violence have been integrated into security studies through the CSS approach (Biṙdişli, 2014;Stamnes, 2004) while criticising realism's foundations regarding security (Newman, 2010).…”
Section: Methodology and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…346-347). CSS also brought ethics to the security agenda (Bourne & Bulley, 2011;Harrington & Lecavalier, 2014). Although there are various schools in CSS, according to Waever, Aberystwyth School should be taken into consideration as representing CSS due to the emancipatory concept (Waever, 2012, p. 52).…”
Section: Critical Security Studies (Css)mentioning
confidence: 99%