2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The environmental geopolitics of allocation: State power and institutional stability in Eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, existing science-based governance institutions, such as regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) or the International Seabed Authority, hold significant potential for accountable and adaptive transboundary governance. However, both have received criticism for their lack of transparency and public engagement and for reinforcing historical use rights through contested and opaque allocation processes 74,75 . More transparency and public accountability would make their existing monitoring efforts a powerful source of engagement with the private sector, science and the public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, existing science-based governance institutions, such as regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) or the International Seabed Authority, hold significant potential for accountable and adaptive transboundary governance. However, both have received criticism for their lack of transparency and public engagement and for reinforcing historical use rights through contested and opaque allocation processes 74,75 . More transparency and public accountability would make their existing monitoring efforts a powerful source of engagement with the private sector, science and the public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where despite the implementation of the catch quota in 1999, illegal and unreported catch continued unabated and total catch continued to increase (Havice, 2021). It was not until over a decade later, in 2010, when fear of stock collapse had intensified, that the quota was set in alignment with scientific recommendations for the first time and enforcement tools such as sanctions were developed (Webster, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both have received criticism for their lack of transparency and public engagement and for reinforcing historical use rights through contested and opaque allocation processes 49,50 . Second, the de facto governing role of mesopelagic science could be democratised by linking to open digital platforms that have transparency as a central aim, such as Global Fishing Watch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%