1961
DOI: 10.1542/peds.27.4.614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Epidemiology of Accidental Poisoning in an Urban Population

Abstract: A group of 100 children who had experienced one episode of accidental poisoning were studied. A group of matched controls were selected from a previous randomized population derived from the City of Syracuse. The composition of study and control groups was similar in all gross characteristics tested. The poisoned group was found to have many more subsequent episodes of poisoning than the control group. These children were more active and mischievous, were more likely to experience falls, had mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the chance that a child would be involved a second time is essentially 1 in SOO. Incredibly, 1 of every 4 children who have such an "accident" is a repeater (Wehrle, DeFreest, Penhollow, & Harris, 1961). Since this incidence is 12S times greater than chance, something must be going on in the family that places the child at risk.…”
Section: Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the chance that a child would be involved a second time is essentially 1 in SOO. Incredibly, 1 of every 4 children who have such an "accident" is a repeater (Wehrle, DeFreest, Penhollow, & Harris, 1961). Since this incidence is 12S times greater than chance, something must be going on in the family that places the child at risk.…”
Section: Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the approximately 50,000 annual poisonings within this age bracket (Fleming, 1960;Verhulst, 1964), only 1 out of every 500 children should be affected, and thus only 1 out of 500 should repeat by chance. The fact that approximately one in four victims do repeat (Wehrle, DeFreest, Penhollow, & Harris, 1961) yields an incidence that is essentially 120 times greater than chance. There must, therefore, be something about the family and/or the child that explains the propensity of some children to repeat.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study is to report the development of an instrument that attempts to identify the accidental poisoning victim who is most likely to repeat. Since the average number of episodes for repeaters is approximately three (Wehrle et al, 1961), repeat episodes probably account for about 33% of all poison accidents. Logically, this number could be reduced significantly if at-risk children were identified and they and/or their families treated, and if the administration of the prediction instrument itself could be an occasion for instructing parents concerning the physical and psychological hazards that contribute to poisoning accidents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation