The epidemiology of regional and widespread musculoskeletal pain in rural versus urban settings in those ≥55 years

Abstract

Objectives: To examine whether the prevalence of regional and chronic widespread pain (CWP) varies with rurality and to determine the characteristics of persons in rural locations in whom pain is found to be in excess. Methods: Participants, aged ≥55 years, from participating general practices in seven different geographical locations in Scotland were sent a postal questionnaire. The 1-month prevalence of 10 regional pain conditions plus CWP was identified using body manikins. Differences in the prevalence of pain with differing rurality were examined using Chi 2 test for trend. Thereafter, among the rural population, the relationships between pain and putative risk factors were examined using Poisson regression. Thus, results are described as risk ratios. Results: There was some evidence to suggest that the prevalence of CWP increased with increasing rurality, although the magnitude of this was slight. No large or significant differences were observed with any regional pain conditions. Factors associated with the reporting of CWP included poor general health, feeling downhearted most of the time and selected measures of social contact. Factors independently associated with CWP included female gender (risk ratio: 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.997-1.55), poor self-rated health (risk ratio: 3.50; 95% CI: 1.92-6.39) and low mood (risk ratio: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.07-2.20). Also, having fewer than 10 people to turn to in a crisis was associated with a decrease in the risk of CWP -risk ratio: 0.68 (95% CI: 0.50-0.93) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.60-1.02) for those with 5-10 and <5 people, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides no evidence that the prevalence of regional musculoskeletal pain is increased in rural settings, although there is some evidence of a modest increase in CWP. Risk factors for CWP are similar to those seen in the urban setting, including markers of general health, mental health and also aspects of social contact. It may be, however, that social networks are more difficult to maintain in rural settings, and clinicians should be aware of the negative effect of perceived social isolation on pain in rural areas. Keywords 87 Key points• Some evidence to suggest that the prevalence of chronic widespread pain (CWP) increased with increasing rurality; • Risk factors for CWP are similar to those seen in the urban setting, including markers of general health, mental health and also aspects of social contact; • In rural areas, individuals who know few of their neighbours, or who rarely see friends/family/neighbours, are at increased risk of CWP.

Is alcohol consumption related to likelihood of reporting chronic widespread pain in people with stable consumption? Results from UK biobank

“…Factors were chosen which were known to be risk factors for pain and were likely to be associated with alcohol consumption. These were: age (years) [21]; Body Mass Index (BMI) [25]; education (having a university degree or not) [19]; deprivation (Townsend Index [24]) [17]; social networks (frequency of visits by family and friends) [3]; mood ('Do you ever feel miserable for no reason? ', and 'Do you often feel fed-up?')…”

Gender-specific associations between fat mass, metabolic syndrome and musculoskeletal pain in community residents: A three-year longitudinal study

“…It, thus, causes a major burden on individuals, health systems, and social care systems, and is expected to become the most important public health challenge with the population aging. The reported prevalence of musculoskeletal pain varies, however, the rate of chronic widespread pain, the most serious category, is rather consistently reported to be around 12% [ 2 ]. Musculoskeletal pain results from multiple, heterogeneous pathologies including osteoarthritis (OA), tendinitis/bursitis and fibromyalgia[ 3 ].…”

Management of Musculoskeletal Pain: An Update with Emphasis on Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

“…While some studies of chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain have suggested that there are no differences between urban and rural populations [13], global prevalence of pain conditions, especially in areas like Central America, South America, and Sub-Saharan Africa, is hard to truly estimate due to poor epidemiologic data. This leads to a likely underestimation of the global impact of musculoskeletal pain.…”