2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Epigravettian chronology and the human population of eastern Central Europe during MIS2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the CB, Early Epigravettian groups were present during the LGM (GS-3–2.1c) and Late Epigravettian in the GS-2.1a-b and early GI-1 periods 7 . According to Lengyel et al 71 Early Epigravettian (26–20 ka cal BP) hunter-gatherers subsisted on reindeer and the wild horse, with reindeer predominating. A marked change was detected in the dominant quarry at the Late Epigravettian sites (20–15.2 ka cal BP), when reindeer decreased, while the wild horse became dominant, and mammoth was present again.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CB, Early Epigravettian groups were present during the LGM (GS-3–2.1c) and Late Epigravettian in the GS-2.1a-b and early GI-1 periods 7 . According to Lengyel et al 71 Early Epigravettian (26–20 ka cal BP) hunter-gatherers subsisted on reindeer and the wild horse, with reindeer predominating. A marked change was detected in the dominant quarry at the Late Epigravettian sites (20–15.2 ka cal BP), when reindeer decreased, while the wild horse became dominant, and mammoth was present again.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the techno-typological analysis of the knapped stone assemblages can help us establish their relative chronology with some confidence. To give an example, a recent review of the MIS2-Late Upper Palaeolithic assemblages of eastern Central Europe (see Lengyel et al, 2021) has shown that the initial Late Glacial Maximum (LGM) assemblages are characterised by domestic tool dominance and the frequent use of flake tools, while the post-LGM assemblages are correlated with armature dominance and blade and bladelet tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the osseous industry recovered at Maszycka is the material echo of various activities carried out by its occupants, it will also be possible to evaluate previous statements on LUP palethnography and site function (Kozłowski et al, 1993). Finally, it will be discussed in what way the results of this study can provide new impulses for the current debate about the recolonisation of central Europe after the LGM, in which the site plays a central role (Kozłowski et al, 2012(Kozłowski et al, , 2017Lengyel et al, 2021;Maier, 2015, 2017a andMaier et al, 2020;Nerudová & Neruda, 2015;Nerudová et al, 2021;Otte, 2012;Pfeifer, 2020;Połtowicz-Bobak, 2013;Połtowicz-Bobak & Bobak, 2020;Terberger, 2013;Wiśniewski et al, 2017).…”
Section: Aim Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When implemented at Maszycka, that model says that apart from a common set of symbols, such as cupules and pointed ovates, which all navette-using groups certainly recognised and understood, and which set them apart from other contemporary traditions of the early Middle Magdalenian (Angevin, 2017;Gauvrit Roux, 2022;Sécher, 2020), the more unique motives served as signals of individuals within their own distinct group. Not only did the Magdalenian hunter-gatherers at Maszycka belong to the first humans who reappeared in the northern mid-latitudes of eastern central Europe after more than three millennia of likely hiatus (Lengyel et al, 2021;Maier et al, 2021;Nerudová & Neruda, 2015;Połtowicz-Bobak & Bobak, 2020), these people were also roaming on the eastern border of the territory occupied by bearers of that techno-complex, which may at the same time have been the western margin of the Epigravettian sphere (Kozłowski et al, 2017;Nerudová & Neruda, 2014;Połtowicz-Bobak, 2020;Wiśniewski et al, 2017), contacts to which are shown by the presence of Volhynian flint originating from outcrops some 300 km to the east (Kozłowski et al, 1993, 179;2017, 197). Under such particular circumstances, both success in hunting as well as group cohesion were certainly particularly important and endorsed through intensified symbolic communication using a common set of signs (comp.…”
Section: Palethnography Of Maszycka Cavementioning
confidence: 99%