2008
DOI: 10.1080/09638230701504999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EPISODE II trial of cognitive and family therapy for relapse prevention in early psychosis: Rationale and sample characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents a number similar to the recruitment rate of a randomized controlled trial of CBT for young people with psychosis (Gleeson et al, 2008) and, as such, provides validation to our analysis of the interview summaries. Although around a third of participants were judged to be uninterested in therapy, around a quarter of participants were judged to be unsure or their interest was unable to be assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This represents a number similar to the recruitment rate of a randomized controlled trial of CBT for young people with psychosis (Gleeson et al, 2008) and, as such, provides validation to our analysis of the interview summaries. Although around a third of participants were judged to be uninterested in therapy, around a quarter of participants were judged to be unsure or their interest was unable to be assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, in a trial of CBT for adults with psychosis, Startup and colleagues noted that 35.8% of potential participants who they approached declined to participate (Startup, Jackson, & Bendix, 2004). A higher refusal rate of 59.6% was observed in a relapse-prevention treatment trial for younger outpatients with remitted first episode psychosis (Gleeson et al, 2008). Finally, in a trial of cognitive therapy for 'non-affective psychosis' conducted by Drury and colleagues (Drury, Birchwood, Cochrane, & Macmillan, 1996), only 34.2% of identified potential participants went on to randomization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for exclusions have been reported elsewhere. 15 Patients who consented and did not consent did not differ significantly on the following variables: sex, age, marital status, highest level of education, weeks in the service, levels of unemployment, and living arrangements (that is, percentage living with family). Further, there were no significant differences between the CBT and the treatment as usual groups about any of the demographics or clinical variables.…”
Section: Participant Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…14 The symptoms of first-episode psychosis and the stigma of mental illness produce 'a maelstrom of emotions' -anxiety, confusion, guilt, blame, helplessness, a sense of isolation -as family members struggle to understand what has happened to their loved ones. 16 Research undertaken by Gleeson et al 17 indicated that a majority (56%) of family members scored at or above a total mean of 5 points on the General Health Questionnaire, recognized as the standard threshold for 'caseness'. Family members themselves were suffering from anxiety or depression of severe enough intensity to warrant the need for treatment.…”
Section: The Needs Of Families In First-episode Psychosismentioning
confidence: 99%