1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02767439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The equation of a contour and the form factor of a hysteresis loop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main conclusion following from those investigations is that in the low-cycle fatigue region the n 1 value does not vary [55,61], whereas in transition to the high-cycle fatigue [48,53,55] the hysteresis loop shape changes and the n 1 value increases that, in accordance with (16), leads to a decrease in K sh . It was shown [53] that, with a decrease in the stress amplitude from 400 to 250 MPa, the n 1 value for a carbon steel increases from 0.15 to 0.4 with a large scatter in the results being observed.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main conclusion following from those investigations is that in the low-cycle fatigue region the n 1 value does not vary [55,61], whereas in transition to the high-cycle fatigue [48,53,55] the hysteresis loop shape changes and the n 1 value increases that, in accordance with (16), leads to a decrease in K sh . It was shown [53] that, with a decrease in the stress amplitude from 400 to 250 MPa, the n 1 value for a carbon steel increases from 0.15 to 0.4 with a large scatter in the results being observed.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The results of the investigations into the variation of the coefficient of the hysteresis loop shape K sh and, accordingly, the coefficient of the hysteresis loop contour n 1 [48,55,61] depending on the plastic strain amplitude per cycle are ambiguous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where K f is the hysteresis loop form factor [9] which for aluminum alloys varies insignificantly and can be taken constant, K f = 3. 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%