2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10436-014-0248-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The equity premium: a deeper puzzle

Abstract: Traditional pre-1930 consumption measures understate the extent of serial correlation in the U.S. annual real growth rate of per capita consumption of nondurables and services due to measurement limitations in the construction of their major components. Under alternative measures proposed in this study, the serial correlation of consumption growth is found to be 0.32, contrary to the original estimate of −0.14. This new evidence implies that the class of dynamic general equilibrium models studied by Mehra and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present context, this difficulty in calibrating δ or, equivalently, in explaining the low rate of return on the risk-free asset has been dubbed the risk-free rate puzzle by Weil (1989). As noted previously, we read this 12 Azeredo (2012) argues that in the pre-1929 period of the Mehra and Prescott (1985) data set, per capita consumption was mismeasured in the standard reported statistics. If it is measured in a way that is more in keeping with practice in the post-1929 period, the serial correlation in consumption growth over the entire sample period (1889À1978) is 0.42, not À0.14 as Mehra and Prescott (1985) report.…”
Section: Box 102 Calculating the Equilibrium Price Functionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the present context, this difficulty in calibrating δ or, equivalently, in explaining the low rate of return on the risk-free asset has been dubbed the risk-free rate puzzle by Weil (1989). As noted previously, we read this 12 Azeredo (2012) argues that in the pre-1929 period of the Mehra and Prescott (1985) data set, per capita consumption was mismeasured in the standard reported statistics. If it is measured in a way that is more in keeping with practice in the post-1929 period, the serial correlation in consumption growth over the entire sample period (1889À1978) is 0.42, not À0.14 as Mehra and Prescott (1985) report.…”
Section: Box 102 Calculating the Equilibrium Price Functionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Concerning the persistence of the MRP, Dimson et al (2006) found evidence that US HEPs were lower than frequently quoted historical averages, and concluded that their performance cannot contribute to forward-looking equity premia because of its lack of persistence. Other authors tried to estimate the MRP with persistent proxies; for instance, Azeredo (2014) searched for the mechanisms determining the behaviour of the equity premium under persistent consumption growth, and Chang-Jin et al (2004) investigated the relationship between stock market volatility and the equity premium. Finally, Andersen et al (2006) studied the persistence and predictability of the realized betas rather than the MRP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%