2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4073(99)00134-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The equivalence between two techniques of angular interpolation for the discrete-ordinates method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding our way of analyzing the results for the radiances computed by the codes, we note that while the PNMARK and PEESNA codes possess accurate angular interpolation techniques (the sourcefunction integration technique (Garcia, 2000) and the dummy-node inclusion technique (Chalhoub and Garcia, 2000), respectively) and the LTSN code possesses a simple linear interpolation scheme in , the HYDROLIGHT code does not possess any and restricts the allowed directions to the discrete angles generated by the quad partitioning performed by HYDROLIGHT-1. In principle, this restriction could be overcome by means of an external interpolation scheme, but this could introduce additional errors into the results of HYDROLIGHT.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding our way of analyzing the results for the radiances computed by the codes, we note that while the PNMARK and PEESNA codes possess accurate angular interpolation techniques (the sourcefunction integration technique (Garcia, 2000) and the dummy-node inclusion technique (Chalhoub and Garcia, 2000), respectively) and the LTSN code possesses a simple linear interpolation scheme in , the HYDROLIGHT code does not possess any and restricts the allowed directions to the discrete angles generated by the quad partitioning performed by HYDROLIGHT-1. In principle, this restriction could be overcome by means of an external interpolation scheme, but this could introduce additional errors into the results of HYDROLIGHT.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we present a summary of an improved version of the analytical discrete-ordinates method that has been the subject of some recent works (Barichello and Siewert, 1999;Barichello et al, 2000;Chalhoub and Garcia, 2000;Siewert, 2000). In particular, the method incorporates some recently developed techniques for finding particular solutions (Barichello et al, 2000;Siewert, 2000) and dummy-node inclusion (Chalhoub and Garcia, 2000) as its angular interpolation technique.…”
Section: The Analytical Discrete-ordinates Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we present a summary of an improved version of the analytical discrete-ordinates method that has been the subject of some recent works (Barichello and Siewert, 1999;Barichello et al, 2000;Chalhoub and Garcia, 2000;Siewert, 2000). In particular, the method incorporates some recently developed techniques for finding particular solutions (Barichello et al, 2000;Siewert, 2000) and dummy-node inclusion (Chalhoub and Garcia, 2000) as its angular interpolation technique.…”
Section: The As N Methods (Peesna Computational Code)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the method incorporates some recently developed techniques for finding particular solutions (Barichello et al, 2000;Siewert, 2000) and dummy-node inclusion (Chalhoub and Garcia, 2000) as its angular interpolation technique. Note that we only present here a simplified version for treating the type of problems described in the test problem section.…”
Section: The As N Methods (Peesna Computational Code)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scattering phase function b(t, m, w; m 0 , w 0 ) gives the scattering beam angular distribution, and the source term is S(t, m, w). PEESNA (Chalhoub and Garcia 2000) ad LTSN (Barichello and Vilhena 1993) are analytical methods based on the discrete-ordinate solution of the RTE. As an example of the formers, we can cite Monte Carlo method.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%