2001
DOI: 10.4064/fm167-3-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The equivariant universality and couniversality of the Cantor cube

Abstract: Abstract. Let G, X, α be a G-space, where G is a non-Archimedean (having a local base at the identity consisting of open subgroups) and second countable topological group, and X is a zero-dimensional compact metrizable space. Let H({0,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) It is well known that the symmetric group S N is universal for NA second countable groups. The same is true for the group of homeomorphisms Homeo(2 ω ), [24]. Therefore, S N is embedded into Homeo(2 ω ) and also Homeo(2 ω ) is embedded into S N .…”
Section: Corollary 54 the Homomorphismmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2) It is well known that the symmetric group S N is universal for NA second countable groups. The same is true for the group of homeomorphisms Homeo(2 ω ), [24]. Therefore, S N is embedded into Homeo(2 ω ) and also Homeo(2 ω ) is embedded into S N .…”
Section: Corollary 54 the Homomorphismmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For example, the Polish group S N is universal for all second countable (Polish) NA groups. The same is true for the Polish group H(2 ω ) (homeomorphism group of the Cantor cube 2 ω ), [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) ⇒ (3) If the right uniformity µ is non-archimedean then by Lemma 3.1 the completion ( X, µ f in ) of its precompact replica (Samuel compactification of (X, µ)) is again non-archimedean. Now recall (see for example [35]) that this completion is just the greatest G-compactification β G G (the G-space analog of the Stone-Čech compactification) of G.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus (M, T ) is the unique universal minimal system (although not as a pointed system; fixing a distinguished point m 0 ∈ M and given a pointed minimal system (X, x 0 , T ), a homomorphism φ : L → X with φ(m 0 ) = x 0 may not exist). The next theorem is due to Pestov [6] (see also [5]). …”
Section: The Universal Transitive and Minimal Systems Of A Topologicamentioning
confidence: 99%