2015
DOI: 10.7554/elife.06970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ER Stress Surveillance (ERSU) pathway regulates daughter cell ER protein aggregate inheritance

Abstract: Stress induced by cytoplasmic protein aggregates can have deleterious consequences for the cell, contributing to neurodegeneration and other diseases. Protein aggregates are also formed within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), although the fate of ER protein aggregates, specifically during cell division, is not well understood. By simultaneous visualization of both the ER itself and ER protein aggregates, we found that ER protein aggregates that induce ER stress are retained in the mother cell by activation of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(96 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If true, the latter scenario would suggest that pnER-localized and cER-localized Kar2-sfGFP acquire different properties during ER stress. To test the first possibility, we examined the formation of CPY*-mRFP or GFP-CFTR protein aggregates in each ER subdomain during ER stress (Kakoi et al, 2013; Fu and Sztul, 2003; Pina and Niwa, 2015). CPY*-mRFP aggregates activate both the UPR and ERSU pathways, whereas GFP-CFTR aggregates do not (Pina and Niwa, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If true, the latter scenario would suggest that pnER-localized and cER-localized Kar2-sfGFP acquire different properties during ER stress. To test the first possibility, we examined the formation of CPY*-mRFP or GFP-CFTR protein aggregates in each ER subdomain during ER stress (Kakoi et al, 2013; Fu and Sztul, 2003; Pina and Niwa, 2015). CPY*-mRFP aggregates activate both the UPR and ERSU pathways, whereas GFP-CFTR aggregates do not (Pina and Niwa, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the first possibility, we examined the formation of CPY*-mRFP or GFP-CFTR protein aggregates in each ER subdomain during ER stress (Kakoi et al, 2013; Fu and Sztul, 2003; Pina and Niwa, 2015). CPY*-mRFP aggregates activate both the UPR and ERSU pathways, whereas GFP-CFTR aggregates do not (Pina and Niwa, 2015). This difference allows us to observe the cER and pnER localization pattern of aggregates that do or do not induce ER stress.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing attention has been given to ER stress for the roles it plays in many diseases, including diabetes [87], cardiovascular diseases [88], cancer [89], inflammation [90] and neurodegeneration [91]. IRE1α is the most sensitive UPR branch in mammalian cells upon ER stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we discovered a cell cycle checkpoint for ensuring that functional ER is transferred to the daughter cell during the cell cycle, which we termed the ER stress surveillance (ERSU) pathway (Babour et al, 2010;Pina et al, 2018;Pina et al, 2016;Pina and Niwa, 2015). If the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins exceeds ER functional capacity, ER homeostasis is disrupted, leading to a condition known as ER stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%