2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The estimation of (co)variance components and genetic parameters for growth traits and Kleiber ratios in Malpura sheep of India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
17
4
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
15
17
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…RASHIDI et al (2008) fi tted different models to evaluate average daily gain from birth to weaning of Kermani sheep and reported that the best model included the direct additive genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects. Moreover, PRAKASH et al (2012), in Mapura sheep of India, found that the best model for ADG1 and ADG3 included the direct genetic and permanent environmental effects, and for ADG2, it considered only the direct additive effect. Ciência Rural, v.43, n.12, dez, 2013.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RASHIDI et al (2008) fi tted different models to evaluate average daily gain from birth to weaning of Kermani sheep and reported that the best model included the direct additive genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects. Moreover, PRAKASH et al (2012), in Mapura sheep of India, found that the best model for ADG1 and ADG3 included the direct genetic and permanent environmental effects, and for ADG2, it considered only the direct additive effect. Ciência Rural, v.43, n.12, dez, 2013.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of phenotypic correlation estimates for BWT and 3MWT in literature varied from 0.25 (Jafaroghli et al, 2010) to 0.49 (Prakash et al, 2012). Three month weight had negative phenotypic correlation with 12MWT probably could be due to environmental and managemental variations.…”
Section: Phenotypic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It was calculated using the formula (lny t2 -lny t1 )/(t 2 -t 1 ), where 'ln' denotes the natural logarithm and y t1 and y t2, the weights in grams at time 1 (t 1 ) and time 2 (t 2 ) respectively (Fitzhugh and Taylor, 1971). The Kleiber ratio (KR) is the proportion of ADG to the metabolic body weight and was calculated using the formula ADG/W 0.75 where, W 0.75 denotes the metabolic body weight at the older age of the period for which KR is calculated (Prakash et al, 2012). The number of sires and dams, least squares means, standard deviations and coefficients of variation for the respective traits are summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In model 3, inflated h 2 estimates were observed for all the traits, probably due to a very high negative covariance between direct and maternal effect. The high negative correlation between direct and maternal genetic effects is an indication of how difficult it is to simultaneously improve both these traits in a selection programme (Prakash et al, 2012). This antagonism between the effects of an individual's genes for growth and those of its dam for a maternal contribution may arise from genes having antagonistic pleiotropic effects on maternal performance and offspring trait.…”
Section: Body Weight Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation