1999
DOI: 10.2114/jpa.18.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Estimation of the Heritability of Anthropometric Measurements.

Abstract: Abstract. The relative contributions of genetic and environmental components in the variability of anthropometric measurements were studied in 54 twin pairs. Thirty pairs of monozygotic (MZ) and 24 pairs of dizygotic (DZ) twins were investigated to estimate the role of genetic, environmental and hereditary factors determining anthropometric measurements comprising body weight, standing height, sitting height, knee height, arm span, chest circumference and biiliac diameter. Within-pair variance for all the meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results failed to demonstrate the same genetic influence on weight and BMI in a sample of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. In our subjects, the heritability for height was high (0.95), confirming the literature (Chatterjee et al, 1999). Moreover, other anthropometric measures also presented high heritability (biepicondylar breadth of the femur, tricipital skinfold, supra spinal skinfold and medial calf skinfold).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results failed to demonstrate the same genetic influence on weight and BMI in a sample of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. In our subjects, the heritability for height was high (0.95), confirming the literature (Chatterjee et al, 1999). Moreover, other anthropometric measures also presented high heritability (biepicondylar breadth of the femur, tricipital skinfold, supra spinal skinfold and medial calf skinfold).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recently, Steegmann (2006) has criticized the classic trend to focus physiological anthropology on natural selection theory rather than on other "less elevated" issues such as heritability. Indeed, research has also shown the influence of genetic factors on anthropometric and body composition measures (Chatterjee et al, 1999;Faith et al, 1999;Hanisch et al, 2004;Hsu et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the four traits analyzed at the three specific age groups, three exhibited high heritability estimates (>0.60) for some model — BMI (h 2 = 0.64 (± 0.11)), weight (h 2 = 0.63 (± 0.11)), and height (h 2 = 0.88 (± 0.06)). These estimates are somewhat higher than reported in previous studies [4,5]. Of these three, only height showed an increase using the year 12 analysis (h 2 = 0.90 (± 0.06)).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Thus one would expect heritable variation in tallness to disappear, and the heritability of stature to drop to zero. This is obviously not the case, as there is strongly heritable variation for stature left in the population (Chatterjee et al 1999). The most likely reason for this is some form of stabilizing selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%