1980
DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1980.2177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Estimation of the Strength of Masonry Arches.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is therefore only the need to establish that the thrust-line remains completely inside the thickness of the arch, following the classic approach recommended by Heyman [9,28,68,69].…”
Section: Nurbs Kinematic Limit Analysis Model (Nurbs-kla)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is therefore only the need to establish that the thrust-line remains completely inside the thickness of the arch, following the classic approach recommended by Heyman [9,28,68,69].…”
Section: Nurbs Kinematic Limit Analysis Model (Nurbs-kla)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors, not only for FRP but also for FRCM and TRM see e.g. [68,69,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78], utilize interface elements interposed between masonry and FRP reinforcement, but this is quite cumbersome numerically and requires the knowledge of FRP/masonry interface mechanical properties, i.e. a set of parameters difficult to characterize experimentally.…”
Section: Frp Reinforcement Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical bending moments used in the structural design were obtained from a plastic analysis of the arch barrel. The analysis was based on the 4-hinge mechanism method first proposed by Heyman [13] for unreinforced arches subjected to a line load representing the axle of a vehicle. In the author's experience, with short span masonry arch bridges it is usually a single axle load which tends to be critical in the design of strengthening measures rather than combinations of two or more axles where there is usually a measure of relief against sway behaviour.…”
Section: A Design Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following studies first focused on the arch mechanism and understanding the collapse modes (e.g., Coulomb 1773) and subsequently on analyses based on the theory of elasticity, assuming that masonry could sustain high levels of tensile stress (e.g., Navier 1833; Castigliano 1879). The greatest contribution to the analysis of the arch behavior was made by Heyman (1966Heyman ( , 1969Heyman ( , 1980Heyman ( , 1982 by applying the principles of the theory of plasticity to masonry arches (limit analysis) and introducing the geometrical factor of safety and the safety theorem. Livesley (1978) extended the limit analysis approach of Heyman to include sliding and used linear programming to calculate the collapse load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%