2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The estimation of uniaxial compressive strength conversion factor of trona and interbeds from point load tests and numerical modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various studies in the literature proposing relationship between I s(50) and UCS on different rock types but not on conglomerates individually: Oztruk and Altinpinar [6], Ferentinou and Fakir [7], Basu et al [8], Akram and Bakar [9], Quane and Russel [10], Kahraman [11], Fener et al [12], Basu and Aydin [13], Agustawijaia [14], Cobanoglu and Celik [15], Sabatakakis et al [16], Kahraman and Gunaydin [17]. Table 1 lists some of the equations correlating the UCS to I s(50) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various studies in the literature proposing relationship between I s(50) and UCS on different rock types but not on conglomerates individually: Oztruk and Altinpinar [6], Ferentinou and Fakir [7], Basu et al [8], Akram and Bakar [9], Quane and Russel [10], Kahraman [11], Fener et al [12], Basu and Aydin [13], Agustawijaia [14], Cobanoglu and Celik [15], Sabatakakis et al [16], Kahraman and Gunaydin [17]. Table 1 lists some of the equations correlating the UCS to I s(50) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, we adopted two calculation procedures for the half-cylinder cores. Method 1 (M1) was based on the calculation procedure of diametral PLT on cylinder cores, formulae (1) and (2). Method 2 (M2) was based on the calculation procedure of PLT on irregular lumps, formulae (1) and (3).…”
Section: Half-cylinder Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, in order to reduce the complexity of the DEM micromechanical parameter calibration, we selected three kinds of rock as shown in Table 1 (number 2 porphyritic granodiorite, number 3 granodiorite, and number 10 granodiorite porphyry) as the calibration objects. e DEM [28] of structures in rock or soil required calibration of the FJM parameters of materials using UCS tests [2,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. To simulate rocks with different UCS and PLSI, the tensile strength and cohesion of the FJM parameters were varied, while other parameters were kept constant.…”
Section: Parameters Of the Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations