2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10506-017-9211-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ethical Knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, the AI in self-driving cars would be entrusted with implementing users’ ethical choices, while manufacturers/programmers would be tasked with enabling the user’s choice 42. Similarly, an AI in healthcare can be provided guidance as to the moral wishes of the patient—for example, does the patient want to maximise length of life or the quality of life?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the AI in self-driving cars would be entrusted with implementing users’ ethical choices, while manufacturers/programmers would be tasked with enabling the user’s choice 42. Similarly, an AI in healthcare can be provided guidance as to the moral wishes of the patient—for example, does the patient want to maximise length of life or the quality of life?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Giuseppe Contissa and colleagues argue that self‐driving cars should be equipped with an “ethical knob,” so that whoever is currently using the car can set it to their preferred settings. (Contissa, Lagioia, & Sartor, )…”
Section: Part I: What To Do About Unavoidable Crashes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Giuseppe Contissa and colleagues argue that self-driving cars should be equipped with an "ethical knob," so that whoever is currently using the car can set it to their preferred settings. (Contissa, Lagioia, & Sartor, 2017) Jan Gogoll and Julian Müller, in contrast, argue that we all have self-interested reasons to want everyone's cars to be programmed according to the same settings. (Gogoll & Müller, 2017) Cars should have whatever ethics settings best promotes our chances of surviving any accidents we might be involved in.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variance in used keywords for one topic such as "Autonomous vehicle", "Driverless cars", "Self-driving cars" can be seen also as example of the immaturity of shared terms and undisclosed discussion what terms should be used in specific context. [31,36] Artificial morality 2 [22,58] Autonomous agents 2 [22,71] Autonomous vehicle 2 [72,73] Driverless cars 2 [74,75] friendly AI 2 [29,68] Human rights 2 [20,36] human-robot interaction 2 [54,56] Information technology 2 [76,77] Machine Intelligence 2 [19,76] Moral status 2 [31,70] [30,57] Virtue ethics 2 [46,52] The 37 re-occurring keywords where classified into 9 categories as shown in Table V. Classification of keywords was formed following four step process: 1) Linguistic similarity of keywords, for example similarity in spelling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%