2009
DOI: 10.1080/13645570802246724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research

Abstract: It appears that the practice of giving cash or gift vouchers to research participants is becoming increasingly common; however, this practice has received little attention from social researchers. Paying participants has implications in terms of the ethical requirement for consent and may have consequences in terms of recruitment for research projects and for the data collected. In this paper I consider how these issues arose in a research project with lone mothers and the way in which offering payments might … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision to do so was a personal decision made by all members of the research team. Although there is some controversy regarding the use of financial incentives within research, we do not believe the incentive offered created any ethical issues in relation to women feeling obliged to participate out of financial need, given the voucher format and the relatively low value of the incentive (For a more detailed discussion of ethical considerations when using financial incentives in qualitative research see Head (2009)). All 75 women who received the initial invitation were re-contacted with this offer and the remaining 88 women were sent the modified invitation letter.…”
Section: Recruitment Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision to do so was a personal decision made by all members of the research team. Although there is some controversy regarding the use of financial incentives within research, we do not believe the incentive offered created any ethical issues in relation to women feeling obliged to participate out of financial need, given the voucher format and the relatively low value of the incentive (For a more detailed discussion of ethical considerations when using financial incentives in qualitative research see Head (2009)). All 75 women who received the initial invitation were re-contacted with this offer and the remaining 88 women were sent the modified invitation letter.…”
Section: Recruitment Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paying people for interviews may be coercive, and may conflict with ideas of informed consent being freely given, especially in poor areas (Head 2009, Creed-Kanashiro et al 2005. There is a counter-argument that omitting to make payments (or gift-giving) is unethical.…”
Section: Compensation or Rewards -How Do These Relate To Understandinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethical considerations regarding incentivized research practices are particularly heightened when research concerns the involvement of vulnerable populations like those economically marginalized (Fry, Hall, Ritter, & Jenkinson, 2006;Head, 2009;Macklin, 1981;McNeill, 1997;Salmon et al, 2010). Arguments surrounding the ethical debate on the use of incentives in research with human subjects typically postulate whether incentives cause undue influence or serve as coercion to participate and compromise the dignity of the subject (Grant & Sugarman, 2004).…”
Section: "Where Does All This Information Go?" the Practice Of (Un)inmentioning
confidence: 99%