2017
DOI: 10.3167/arrs.2017.080109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ethics of Collective Sponsorship: Virtuous Action and Obligation in Contemporary Tibet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Caple (2017) writes that “Generosity practices ( dāna ) are not only central to lay Buddhist practice, but also play a crucial role in legitimizing and reproducing the social order” within Buddhism's diverse cultural contexts (p. 146). Historically and in many contemporary Buddhist settings, the association of dāna with merit stabilizes and reinforces the social order of lay‐monastic relations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Caple (2017) writes that “Generosity practices ( dāna ) are not only central to lay Buddhist practice, but also play a crucial role in legitimizing and reproducing the social order” within Buddhism's diverse cultural contexts (p. 146). Historically and in many contemporary Buddhist settings, the association of dāna with merit stabilizes and reinforces the social order of lay‐monastic relations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically and in many contemporary Buddhist settings, the association of dāna with merit stabilizes and reinforces the social order of lay‐monastic relations. Caple continues by adding that generosity practices “also display and reinforce newly emerging social and economic hierarchies”—revealing and enabling religious change (Caple, 2017, p. 146). However, among informal charity networks in Vietnam, uses of dāna went beyond displaying and reinforcing new relationships among lay and monastic communities, instead serving as a tool to disrupt lay‐monastic relations altogether.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interactions within these spaces tend to be spontaneous and unstructured, unlike the more institutionalized laymonastic exchanges of Tibetan or Theravada Buddhist societies (cf. Spiro 1982;Tambiah 1970Tambiah , 1982Caple 2015Caple , 2017. Socio-politically, the Han temple-going public does not automatically adopt roles of discipleship or patronage toward resident monastics, nor do they necessarily recognize each other as fellow co-religionists, leading to a spectrum of interactions from deferential exchanges to more egalitarian encounters, all within shared ritual spaces.…”
Section: Navigating Socioreligious Dynamics In Buddhist Monastic Publicsmentioning
confidence: 99%