King's College LondonThis paper explores de facto statelessness amongst ethnically Vietnamese communities in Cambodia. It demonstrates that the inaccessibility of citizenship rights is not rooted directly in what documents an individual possesses, but in collective mobilities driven by a combination or past and present and potential risks. Specifically, the reluctance of officials to replace documents for those they perceive not to be ethnically Khmer means that even ethnically Vietnamese Cambodians possessing a full set of documents -and who have never crossed a border -are encouraged to pursue similar mobilities to those who have none, including first generation immigrants. The higher level of environmental risk associated with these ethnically mediated, informal livelihoods further reduces these households' stocks of physical documentation, inducing a reliance on social networks that are vulnerable to evictions and harassment.On this basis, this paper proposes the category of liminal statelessness, in order to better conceptualize a situation in which people with different legal statuses and abilities to prove them share livelihoods characterized by the non-exercise of citizenship rights. its aftermath -has left their communities with a patchwork of documentation whose impacts are felt across generations. For those thus afflicted, citizenship is therefore not an absolute state, but a question of degree (Ang et al., 2014;Sperfeldt and Nguyen, 2012), rooted more in the everyday judgments of ethnicity enacted by officials than such abstractions as legal status and entitlement. Statelessness for ethnically Vietnamese populations is therefore continually re-entrenched by shared practices of mobility which help to circumvent these forms of administrative marginality, but also mark out those who undertake them as subject to uncertain citizenship. Referred to here as collective mobilities, these practices of movement become a key form of distinction between those whose legal status is secure and those whose isn't.These everyday, practiced, nuances of statelessness are, however, little noted in a literature dominated by legalistic frameworks, leaving the full 'complexity and gravity of the problem of statelessness' (Van Waas, 2009: 133) underexplored. In particular, the category of 'de facto' statelessness remains unclearly delineated, especially in its relationship to limited or ineffective citizenship. This paper therefore proposes the category of liminal statelessness, a conceptualization that focuses on the gray areas between citizenship and statelessness, in order to highlight the multiple heterogenous factors beyond documentation and legal status that combine to influence interaction between communities and the state.After outlining the theoretical, methodological and empirical background to the study, the paper will use data from an ethnographic, multi-sited, study to present this argument in three parts. First, it will highlight the articulated nature of exclusion faced by ethnically Vietnamese communities in C...