Science, Freedom, Democracy 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9780367823436-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ethos of Science and Central Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the relative percentages of managing moves remained at the lower boundary (6.3%; Figure 3), it can be considered that these moves were worthwhile in restructuring and sharing social authority in addition to the EJC moves. This contributed to the ethos of mutual respect in which neither the teacher nor the students were the primary motivators of the initiation of their new topics (Christoph & Nystrand, 2001;Hartl, 2021). Instead, during the negotiations, the students were engaged in listening and responding to the utterances of others through the managing (MDF moves, Table 1) and EJC moves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the relative percentages of managing moves remained at the lower boundary (6.3%; Figure 3), it can be considered that these moves were worthwhile in restructuring and sharing social authority in addition to the EJC moves. This contributed to the ethos of mutual respect in which neither the teacher nor the students were the primary motivators of the initiation of their new topics (Christoph & Nystrand, 2001;Hartl, 2021). Instead, during the negotiations, the students were engaged in listening and responding to the utterances of others through the managing (MDF moves, Table 1) and EJC moves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, during the negotiations, the students were engaged in listening and responding to the utterances of others through the managing (MDF moves, Table 1) and EJC moves. In conclusion, the TS-dominated patterning of interactions did not have a damaging influence; instead, it promoted scaffolding and aided in continuing to travel during the discursive journey (Christoph & Nystrand, 2001;Hartl, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%