2020
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2020.1851468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EU and migration in the Mediterranean: EU borders’ control by proxy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the practices of border control are seldom consistent with the humanitarian approach that the EU, the European Commission in particular, often claims to adopt. Conversely, the analysis of EU cooperation with SNCs confirms the results of previous studies arguing that the EU tends to manage the migration crisis via ‘EU borders’ control by proxy’ (Panebianco, 2022a), compromising humanitarian stances, international law, and the implementation of international protection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the practices of border control are seldom consistent with the humanitarian approach that the EU, the European Commission in particular, often claims to adopt. Conversely, the analysis of EU cooperation with SNCs confirms the results of previous studies arguing that the EU tends to manage the migration crisis via ‘EU borders’ control by proxy’ (Panebianco, 2022a), compromising humanitarian stances, international law, and the implementation of international protection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The EU has thus developed a wide range of legal and political measures aimed at implementing international cooperation in this specific field, involving transit and origin countries in the EU's management of migration and asylum. This process is known as the ‘external dimension’ of the European MAP (Longo, 2022) and has so far been analyzed to understand EU migration governance (Huysmans, 2000; Lazaridis and Wadia, 2015; Moreno-Lax, 2018), or to explore the practices of external migration management in Europe (Bello, 2022; Fontana, 2022; Leonard and Kaunert, 2022; Panebianco, 2022a). Most of this literature has stressed that the ‘external dimension’ is mainly guided by the EU's will to shift responsibilities for migrants and refugees toward transit and/or origin countries and, sometimes, this involves agreements which do not comply with international and European standards of human rights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this practice became a contentious political instrument. Departing from the humanitarian essence of SAR operations, subsequent Italian governments raised the issue of defending the EU's borders, discouraging SARs and investing instead on the externalization of EU border control via agreements with the Libyan authorities (Panebianco 2020b).…”
Section: Research Questions and Methodological Choices: Assessing The Italian Center-periphery Cleavage On Migration Via A Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional cooperation processes such as the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, the European Neighborhood Policy or the Union for the Mediterranean included or excluded EU partners/neighbors, responding either to the logic of region-building or to that of bilateralism (Bicchi et al 2018). Also in the context of migration, the EU tends to redefine the borders in a sort of border-shifting process (Panebianco 2020b).…”
Section: Theoretical Debates On Human Security At the Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation