The EU Index of Integration Effort

König, Jörg

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50860-3_3

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In order to examine whether EU-China trade weakened the trade links among EU countries and produced the so-called disintegration effect, we design the following identification strategy. König and Ohr (2013) and König (2015) proposed the index of "EU importance", the proportion of trade with EU partners in the foreign trade of an EU country. Following this, we use the trade share to examine whether there was a "China effect" on disintegration.…”

Section: The Strategy Of Identificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 2007, it is EU-27. In 2013-2015, it is EU-28. As a result, we attain an unbalanced panel with an observation value of 10170.…”

Section: Data Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most recent development occurred in the summer of 2016, when Britain voted to leave the EU. Consequently, the trade share within the EU is seen as an index of “EU importance”, capturing the sentiment of a “big family” among EU member states (König, 2015; König & Ohr, 2013). However, the following three facts exhibit a growing decline of “EU importance”.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

EU‐China trade and intra‐EU trade: Substitute or complementary?

Chen

Luo

Renard

et al. 2021

Journal of Economic Surveys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines how EU-China trade affected intra-EU trade. The estimation shows that when a country's share of trade with China increased, its share of trade with EU partners declined. This suggests that stronger trade links with China resulted in weaker trade links among EU countries. Furthermore, the "disintegration" effect of the export to China was stronger than that of import from China, meaning that the influence of China as an export destination was greater than that of China as a source of import. An extended analysis shows that the disintegration effect was most strongly felt in trade links among EU core countries, less strongly felt in trade links between EU core and periphery countries, and least strongly felt in trade links among EU periphery countries. In comparison, we find that EU import from the US and India significantly weakened and strengthened intra-EU trade respectively. Estimation results using product level data demonstrate that the effects depend on the types of products we are concerned with. Whether using gross value or value added, the conclusions remain valid.

show abstract

Section: The Strategy Of Identificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 2007, it is EU-27. In 2013-2015, it is EU-28. As a result, we attain an unbalanced panel with an observation value of 10170.…”

Section: Data Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

EU‐China trade and intra‐EU trade: Substitute or complementary?

Chen

Luo

Renard

et al. 2021

Journal of Economic Surveys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A comprehensive indicator that reflects the stages of development of the integration process (acquis communautaire, Single Market integration, Economic and Monetary Union, economic convergence) and is proposed to be used to assess the integration aspirations of EU countries, was developed by J. König (2017). In a research by Mursalova, Kh.N.…”

Section: Building the Integrated Index Of The Potential For Integration Process Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The problem of statistical assessment of the potential for the development of regional integration processes

Osaulenko¹,

Bulatova

Zakharova

et al. 2021

Statistics in Transition New Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present article illustrates the use of integrated indices to evaluate the potential for the development of regional integration processes. The study examines a new research and methodological approach, which involves the use of an integral index of the potential for the development of integration processes, proposed with regard to the intensity of the influence of internal and external factors on integrative relations development. The application of the above-mentioned integrated index in a comparative analysis of the potential for the development of integration processes allows a comprehensive and quantitative description of the current regional integration processes taking place in the modern economy under certain regional models.

show abstract

“…3) The fourth sub-type of composite index was developed by the University for Regional Integration [7]. The essence of the method was to rank the participating countries according to the degree of their share in strengthening the integration association on the basis of the most important indicators, as a share of the volume of trade within the integration association in the total volume of foreign trade of each share of countries in GDP in an integration association; degree of convergence; homogeneity of integration integration; GDP per capita; the purchasing power of the country in relation to the total in the integration association, etc.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Methodological Approaches to Assessing the Effectiveness of International Integration Associations

Mursalova¹

2019

OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The EU Index of Integration Effort

Cited by 10 publications

References 14 publications

EU‐China trade and intra‐EU trade: Substitute or complementary?

EU‐China trade and intra‐EU trade: Substitute or complementary?

The problem of statistical assessment of the potential for the development of regional integration processes

Methodological Approaches to Assessing the Effectiveness of International Integration Associations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About