2021
DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EU Institutional Architecture in the Covid‐19 Response: Coordinative Europeanization in Times of Permanent Emergency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In many EU contexts, pandemic policies were carried out under states of emergencies, through the implementation of various types of emergency powers acts, or by way of non-binding soft laws. Ladi and Wolff (2021) demonstrate that the EU response to the pandemic significantly differed from earlier crises such as the Eurozone crisis, and argue that the state of emergency that arose across the EU may end up being "more permanent than temporary" because a coordinate mode of Europeanization emerged between Brussels and member states. The decision to lay out and then create massive tracking systems (via smartphone apps) was made very early in the first wave of the pandemic.…”
Section: Digital-based Surveillancementioning
confidence: 84%
“…In many EU contexts, pandemic policies were carried out under states of emergencies, through the implementation of various types of emergency powers acts, or by way of non-binding soft laws. Ladi and Wolff (2021) demonstrate that the EU response to the pandemic significantly differed from earlier crises such as the Eurozone crisis, and argue that the state of emergency that arose across the EU may end up being "more permanent than temporary" because a coordinate mode of Europeanization emerged between Brussels and member states. The decision to lay out and then create massive tracking systems (via smartphone apps) was made very early in the first wave of the pandemic.…”
Section: Digital-based Surveillancementioning
confidence: 84%
“…A different reading is provided by other scholars (Bokhorst & Corti, 2023;Ladi & Wolff, 2021;Schramm et al, 2022), according to which hypothesizing a fully hierarchical approach in the implementation of the RRF would be unrealistic. Preliminary evidence by Vanhercke and Verdun (2022) shows that despite the Commission and notably DG ECFIN being in the driving seat of the RRF, national actors have options too and especially social actors both at national and European level are strategically using the institutional structures of the revised Semester as a vehicle to 'have a say' in the RRF.…”
Section: Analysing the Impact Of The Rrf On National Social Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kartta ja muu vertaileva tuotettu tieto merkittävästi edisti jäsenvaltioiden keskinäistä oppimista (Pacces ja Weimer 2020). Näin eurooppalainen tautistrategia toteutui pikemminkin vapaaehtoisuuden kuin sääntelyn kautta (Ladi ja Wolff 2021).…”
Section: Tiedollinen Epävarmuus Ja Tietojenvaihtounclassified