2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16241-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EU Regulatory Landscape of Non-Biological Complex Drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 The anionic, sulfate groups give heparin the highest negative charge density of any known biomolecule. 28 The sulfates appear to be critical to heparin's fibril enhancement role, as their removal has been found to result in the loss of heparin's ability to promote the aggregation of Aβ 40 and Aβ 42 . 29,30 Proteins and polyelectrolytes such as heparin form complexes primarily due to electrostatic interactions.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27 The anionic, sulfate groups give heparin the highest negative charge density of any known biomolecule. 28 The sulfates appear to be critical to heparin's fibril enhancement role, as their removal has been found to result in the loss of heparin's ability to promote the aggregation of Aβ 40 and Aβ 42 . 29,30 Proteins and polyelectrolytes such as heparin form complexes primarily due to electrostatic interactions.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heparin is an unbranched, linear polymer of disaccharide units consisting of N-sulfated glucosamine (GlcNS) and iduronic acid linked by a (1–4) glycosidic bond (Figure ). The anionic, sulfate groups give heparin the highest negative charge density of any known biomolecule . The sulfates appear to be critical to heparin’s fibril enhancement role, as their removal has been found to result in the loss of heparin’s ability to promote the aggregation of Aβ 40 and Aβ 42 . , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulatory agencies require detailed studies to know the nano-drug's precise disposition, analyzing the encapsulated, non-encapsulated and total drug (encapsulated plus non-encapsulated) [316]. In recent years, it has become necessary to include PK of the concentrations of bound drug (non-encapsulated bound to plasma proteins) and unbound drug (non-encapsulated that has not bound to plasma proteins) because non-linear protein binding changes the pharmacokinetic profile of the nanoformulation [317]. Overlooking protein binding and assuming it does not influence the profile constitutes a bias error.…”
Section: Regulation Of Pharmacokinetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as bioequivalence is concerned, in the case of complex active substances and complex formulations measuring plasma concentration of the free active substance may not be enough. This may be due to the properties of the nanocarrier, as in the case of liposomes, or to the local action of the drug, as in the case of Cyclosporine eye drops [6,12]. The FDA has issued regulations on assessing bioequivalence beyond plasma concentration, and it may consider other approaches, if deemed adequate (21 C.F.R.…”
Section: Nbcds Copies From a Regulatory Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%