We study how the adoption of the euro as the common currency in Europe has affected firms' investment rates. Using corporate data from the eleven countries that adopted the euro in January 1999, as well as from a control sample of five other European countries, our paper shows that: (i) the euro has increased investments for firms from countries that previously had weak currencies, (ii) the euro has had a positive impact on financially constrained firms' investments, and (iii) the euro has decreased investments for financially unconstrained firms from countries that previously had strong currencies.
Disciplines
Finance | Finance and Financial Management
CommentsAt the time of publication, author Yrjo Koskinen was affiliated with Boston University School of Management and CEPR. Currently, he is a faculty member at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. We thank seminar audiences at SIFR and SITE in Stockholm, the 2004 EFA meetings in Maastricht, Binghamton University, as well as Franklin Allen, Marco Pagano, Michael Schill, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments.An earlier version of the paper constituted a part of the manuscript "The Euro Is Good After All: Corporate Evidence", which was presented at the ECB-CFS workshop in Helsinki. Nilsson acknowledges …nancial support from Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius'Foundation. All remaining errors are our sole responsibility.
AbstractWe study how the adoption of the euro as the common currency in Europe has a¤ected …rms'investment rates. Using corporate data from the eleven countries that adopted the euro in January 1999, as well as from a control sample of …ve other European countries, our paper shows that: (i) the euro has increased investments for …rms from countries that previously had weak currencies, (ii) the euro has had a positive impact on …nancially constrained …rms' investments, and (iii) the euro has decreased investments for …nancially unconstrained …rms from countries that previously had strong currencies.