2021
DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2021.1883553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Euro and SUT-RAS methods: some further considerations

Abstract: The main objective of this paper is to revisit the Euro method in a critical and constructive way. We have analysed some arguments against the Euro method published recently in the literature as well as some other relevant aspects of the SUT-Euro and SUT-RAS methods not covered before. Although not being the Euro method perfect, we believe that there is still space for the use of the Euro method in updating/regionalizing Supply and Use tables.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.1), or choosing 25 The explicit partition of the set of missing entries into validation and test sets is not reported in the figure, since such partition is randomly generated. 26 It is well known from the standard practice of projection of I/O tables that it is typically better to use a table in previous years to project missing pieces of current I/O tables than using current I/O tables of similar countries (Rueda-Cantuche et al 2018;Valderas-Jaramillo et al 2021). One reason is that the former gathers detailed country-specific information that is not expected to change in the short term.…”
Section: Matrix Completion Applied To Historical Data For Groups Of S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.1), or choosing 25 The explicit partition of the set of missing entries into validation and test sets is not reported in the figure, since such partition is randomly generated. 26 It is well known from the standard practice of projection of I/O tables that it is typically better to use a table in previous years to project missing pieces of current I/O tables than using current I/O tables of similar countries (Rueda-Cantuche et al 2018;Valderas-Jaramillo et al 2021). One reason is that the former gathers detailed country-specific information that is not expected to change in the short term.…”
Section: Matrix Completion Applied To Historical Data For Groups Of S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the CE method also has multiple variants to deal with various situations, such as the modified CE (MCE), generalized CE (GCE), and composite CE (CCE) . Currently, the effectiveness and efficiency of the RAS-based methods and CE-based methods compared with other nonsurvey methods (e.g., Euro method , ) have been widely demonstrated in previous studies. ,,,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explicit partition of the set of missing entries into validation and test sets is not reported in the figure, since such partition is randomly generated 24. It is well-known from the standard practice of projection of I/O tables that it is typically better to use a table in previous years to project missing pieces of current I/O tables than using current I/O tables of similar countries[34,44]. One reason is that the former gather detailed country-specific information that is not expected to change in the short term.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%