The European Court on Human Rights: the problem of unenforceable judgments

Chernichenko, Stanislav Valentinovich

doi:10.24833/0869-0049-2018-3-6-17

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…С. 4 14. По данному вопросу автор публикации неоднократно обращался к представителям МИД и Генпрокуратуры Азербайджана.…”

unclassified

On the Entry Into Force of Constituent Acts and Membership in the Commonwealth of Independent States

KREMNEV

2024

ВМУ.11 = LLJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on an analysis of legal norms and the original texts of the constituent documents, the publication argues that the constituent acts of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS, i. e. the Agreement on the creation of the CIS of December 8, 1991 and the Protocol to it of December 21, 1991) came into full force on December 21, 1991. Thus, the Commonwealth as an interstate association was formed precisely on this date, December 21, 1991, and not December 8, 1991, as is widespread in domestic legal science. At the same time, based on an analysis of o cial information from the CIS Executive Committee, a reasoned answer is given to a question that has not previously been covered in legal science (Russian, and especially foreign) - on what date did the constituent acts of the Commonwealth fully come into force for each CIS member state? In addition, the publication assesses the legal status in the Commonwealth of Azerbaĳan, Georgia (before its withdrawal from the CIS in 2009), Moldova and Ukraine.

show abstract

unclassified

On the Entry Into Force of Constituent Acts and Membership in the Commonwealth of Independent States

KREMNEV

2024

ВМУ.11 = LLJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Анализ судебной практики показывает:  суды достаточно часто принятые решения основывают не только на законодательстве Российской Федерации, но и на практике Европейского суда [10]. Данный факт свидетельствует о кардинально новом, качественном уровне подготовки судей;  судьи, анализируя оспариваемые сведения, прибегают к помощи экспертовлингвистов [7].…”

unclassified

Goodwill Protection Issues

Astanin¹,

ZHukovskaya²,

ZHukovskij³

2019

SDTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Значимость нематериальных благ в условиях современных векторов развития и кардинальных преобразований всех сфер жизни резко возрастает. В этом контексте актуальность проблемы защиты деловой репутации обусловлена необходимостью оптимизации законодательной базы и правоприменительной практики, усовершенствования механизма защиты и обеспечения охраны безопасности граждан, создания условий для полноценного развития личности и бизнеса. Ключевые слова: деловая репутация, неимущественные права, моральный вред, правовая защита деловой репутации

show abstract

Amendments to Russian Constitution and International Institutions Decisions: EAEU Prospective

Verlaine¹,

Shashkova

Kudryashova

2020

Полис

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The constitutional reforms in Russia are amongst the most significant news for Russia’s partners in international relations. The configuration of international law and Russian domestic legal order falls within the scope of the constitutional changes of 2020, and there is no chance that this change will be abandoned by the legislator. This particular amendment was not actively commented on during the nationwide discussion on the constitutional reform; it drew mostly experts’ attention. The article alleges that the constitutional amendment restricting the applicability of international case law in Russia is both a transient response to the instant political tension around Russia, and a formalization of the positivistic trend well established in domestic judicial practice. The positivistic trend is part of the process shaping Russia’s own approach to international law. The prospective amendment concerning international case law in the Constitution of the Russian Federation will not hinder the rules expressly stated in the treaties of the EAEU. However, the resolutions of the EAEU’s structures and institutions, including the case law of the Court of the EAEU, are likely to be scrutinized in a defensive way by Russian Constitutional court in situations extraordinary for the Russian State, ensuring their conformity with the unquestionable and unconditional supremacy of the Russian Constitution.

show abstract

The European Court on Human Rights: the problem of unenforceable judgments

Cited by 8 publications

References 2 publications

On the Entry Into Force of Constituent Acts and Membership in the Commonwealth of Independent States

On the Entry Into Force of Constituent Acts and Membership in the Commonwealth of Independent States

Goodwill Protection Issues

Amendments to Russian Constitution and International Institutions Decisions: EAEU Prospective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About